[ChicagoConservative27]

Trump and Reagan the best in my lifetime.

[central_va]

WaPo Poo? No thanks.

[Intar]

Riiight... And WaPo understands it better than anyone else, right? /sarcasm

[central_va]

WaPo = toilet paper.

[Parmy]

Too many Republican, so-called, are just Democrat/Socialists wrapped in Republican regalia just to get elected and rich.

[dhs12345]

Didn't he and his policies defeat the Soviet Union? And in spite of the Democrats fighting him at the time. And it happened peacefully and didn't result in world-wide nuclear war and the extermination of humanity.

I'd say that that was major accomplishment.

[dead]

Stupid article attempts to romneyize Ronald Reagan and use the dumb new scrubbed version of Reagan to isolate Trump supporters.

Totally what I'd expect from a WaPo article on Reagan.

[FreedomVsControl]

Here’s my take. Reagan stood for a return to a common sense, conservative, and nationalist populism. He wasn’t for endless tax cuts, slashing Social Security, free trade with China, or endless foreign wars. None of this. he was for traditional values, national pride, and peace through strength. And he governed that way.

The decade of the 1980s was as close to perfect as a nation can hope for.

Sadly, the dream abruptly ended when Bush, the corporate globalist, took over. We had no idea at the time...

[napscoordinator]

Ugh. Reagan loved the illegals too much. He was no trump.

[T Ruth]

Why the Washington Post Has No Credibility

Washington Post Prints Blatantly False Article: 'Barack Obama, Conservative'

[TexasKamaAina]

I have a strong affection for Reagan but he made two big mistakes: George Bush and amnesty for illegals. We continue to pay for both.

[Bishop_Malachi]

But the Washington Post educate Conservatives on what they missed?