I’ve explained three times to you credulous lot in this thread that the source documents cited in the article don’t in any way back up the author’s claims. You clearly have a computer with a Web browser, or you wouldn’t be able to read this thread. Go to the PHE site, select any three weeks’ reports which are covered in the time periods described in the article, and find for yourself support for the author’s central claim that the immune system is destroyed—you won’t be able to, because IT’S NOT THERE.
Suppose I said, “The Bible says it’s okay to lie about your neighbour and f*** his wife.” Would you say, “Oh, gosh, that’s interesting,” or would you say, “SHOW ME WHERE IT SAYS THAT, IDIOT!” I bet it’s the latter. I’m challenging anyone backing the claims in this article to show me where it says that.
Well.. if the neighbors wife was hot and willing, what the hell.
I was unaware I was one of apparent credulous lot but I’ll accept that label with honor. Right up there with deplorable so I’ll wear it proudly.
My original reply to you in case you forgot was for what you said:
“So the mods should pull opposing views you don’t like...
You want FR to be the same as Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and Google.”
Censorship is bad period and removing things because you disagree with them is nothing but an emotional response because you can’t think of what else to do so hide or remove the problem which solves nothing.
I will state that I haven’t read a single post past your original post/reply #7 because I wasn’t that interested in the article and the replies were going down hill. Now I’m just repsponding to your continued dribble.
That said, if you provided answers than good for you.. Participation Trophy is in the mail.