[Steve Van Doorn]

You're joking right?
Natural immunity is ALWAYS more effective then man made drugs. you're immunity system attacks the variants the drugs attack the specific viral protein it was designed against. It will have a very weak affect on variants if any at all.

If this isn't common knowledge it should be

[Fury]

Natural immunity is ALWAYS more effective then man made drugs.

That’s too general a statement. Example - rabies.

[DannyTN]

I don’t think you understood my post.

If you have natural immunity and you then get a vaccine, does that in any way eliminate, replace or reduce the natural immunity that you already had? Because if it doesn’t then I don’t see this judge being overruled.

Since the 1905 SCOTUS ruling eliminated the possibility of a religious exemption. And this judges ruling used the 1905 ruling to eliminate an exemption for natural immunity. Then the only way that I see you get a court to reverse that ruling, is by showing the vaccine actually reduces immunity for those already recovered.

It’s possible to make a case that since natural immunity is better than vaccine immunity, that the risks of taking the vaccine are unnecessary. But I’m guessing that was argued in this case and the judge didn’t buy it.