Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) had NOTHING to do with natural immunity. The judge ruled on forced vaccinations based on religious first amendment rights.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905)
Jacobson argued that the smallpox vaccination law not only infringed on his religious liberty but also was arbitrary and capricious. The Court disagreed, writing that Jacobson’s individual right must give way to the “common good.”
https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1824/jacobson-v-massachusetts If you could show that receiving a vaccine subsequent to having covid, reduced the natural immunity, you might have a case that a judge could consider.
Smallpox is a very deadly disease, unlike covid.
And the vaccine was proven, not experimental operating under EUA.
They probably didn’t even have a way of measuring natural immunity back in 1905 either.
This ruling stinks. I hope she finds some funding in order to appeal somehow.