According to this new study, it is anti-science and anti-scientific to ban unvaxxed people from public venues & workplaces for the purpose of stopping the spread of the virus. There is NO basis in science for doing so and the virus still spreads among vaxxed people as much as it does among unvaxed people in public venues & workplaces. (Which of course means that vaxed people can spread the virus to others just as much as unvaxed people can).
The real purpose of vax mandates are to inflict enough punishment on otherwise law-abiding citizens to force them to get the vax on pain of losing their jobs and participate in normal educational, business, religious and social life & activities.
It is unconstitutional for the federal government to force private organizations and businesses to act as their “agents” in violating citizen’s constitutional rights. (In United States constitutional law, a state actor is a person who is acting on behalf of a governmental body, and is therefore subject to limitations imposed on government by the United States Constitution, including the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments, which prohibit the federal and state governments from violating certain rights and freedoms.)
Bkmk
Az Joe wrote:
“According to this new study, it is anti-science and anti-scientific to ban unvaxxed people from public venues & workplaces for the purpose of stopping the spread of the virus. There is NO basis in science for doing so and the virus still spreads among vaxxed people as much as it does among unvaxed people in public venues & workplaces. (Which of course means that vaxed people can spread the virus to others just as much as unvaxed people can).
The real purpose of vax mandates are to inflict enough punishment on otherwise law-abiding citizens to force them to get the vax on pain of losing their jobs and participate in normal educational, business, religious and social life & activities.
It is unconstitutional for the federal government to force private organizations and businesses to act as their “agents” in violating citizen’s constitutional rights. (In United States constitutional law, a state actor is a person who is acting on behalf of a governmental body, and is therefore subject to limitations imposed on government by the United States Constitution, including the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments, which prohibit the federal and state governments from violating certain rights and freedoms.)”
Good points.
Has anyone successfully sued and won, using that approach?