I just went to it and it worked.
As for the size:
The total of all the studies at that site comprise of 47,641 subjects and 639 authors.
The Peer-reviewed studies have 17,216 subjects and 474 authors.
The randomized control trials have 6,548 subjects and 371 authors.
As for the details, each trial is discussed in depth - if you click on a trial it takes you to a discussion as well as original trial source
You claim that there is a recommended safe dose - what is that exactly? There has not been any “official” statement to what is the recommended dose for treatment because the people in charge are ignoring the studies that WERE controlled. The doctors who are not ignoring the research are coming up with dosage recommendations and those are the same ones being referred to on FR, such as FLCCC https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-Alliance-I-MASKplus-Protocol-ENGLISH.pdf
and
Dr. Zelenko: https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/treatment-protocol/
More people WOULD be doing this under a doctor’s care if the treatment was not so wrongfully maligned and they were not threatened with losing their jobs and/or medical license.
As for the rest of your statement, you need to go to the link I sent, read the studies, and the discussions, and you will see these are well-controlled, well-conducted trials. The site also gives dozens more links to studies that were not part of the metanalysis with explanations of the issues and flaws that made them unreliable.
I went to it after lunch and it worked. I'm starting to read some of the studies. So far, I have more questions than answers. The glaring one is that there is no consistent pattern of success between them. Some are roaring successes, some are dismal failures. The ones that were used with combined treatments are far and wide in regards to the secondary treatments. For instance, we are starting to learn that monoclonal antibodies are having a high rate of success if given in a timely manner. Just because they were given in conjunction with Ivermectin doesn't mean that Ivermectin was the deciding factor. There is a lot to read here.
You claim that there is a recommended safe dose - what is that exactly?
There is no reccommended safe dose for use against covid. But, the dosage reccommended for approved applications can be found below.
https://www.drugs.com/dosage/ivermectin.html#Precautions
After you read the above link, you should read this:
"Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures. However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans." From the link below:
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/
A lot of the Ivermectin trials end up rebutted like this one:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8097313/