Posted on 10/05/2021 6:57:43 AM PDT by Bon of Babble
“Threats against public servants are not only illegal, they run counter to our nation’s core values,” wrote Attorney General Garland. “Those who dedicate their time and energy to ensuring that our children receive a proper education in a safe environment deserve to be able to do their work without fear for their safety.”
(Excerpt) Read more at justice.gov ...
“… receive a proper education”
There’s the problem in a nutshell.
And he was once considered qualified for the supreme court?
Screw the justice department. You know who the enemies are, treat them accordingly.
What violent school protests is this a hole talking about?
Second, where is a state matter like this any interest for the AG. Maybe he should send his storm troopers to the border where a viable threat to the republic is on going and in contravention to the law.
Not only that #1 but how about last summer. I remember activists getting up in the faces of the cops and screaming and spitting on them as they screamed. They also gave them the double finger (wow! That is so unique). So parents who, wait their turn, speak for allotted amount of time and are reasonable and reasoned in their statements are such a threat. Throw them in jail for insurrection!!!. S/O We really need to wake up and run for school board.
Since when did the DOJ get involved in local issues?
Since we started the push back? They can all GF themselves. It’s time to come down on these assholes once and for all.
Violent threats = Disagreeing with Fascists
The commissars at the Biden Justice Department considers an organized effort to defeat them in an election or public criticism as a “violent threat”.
It’s cool. Just carry a Black Lives Matter sign, trap them inside and set the building on fire. Keep it peaceful. Well, mostly peaceful.
And ignores threats to parents and their children.
Dept of Just Us
harassment, intimidation is apparently
in the eye of the beholder.
So who , exactly, is intimidating and harassing who ?
So,,,,
“We will vote you out if you don’t stop this crap”
Has now been labeled
Intimidation and harassment ?
Since when
is petitioning for right of redress
intimidation and harassment ?
Direct frontal attack on the
1st amendment
and right of redress
is what this is.
What’s next ?
Campaigning for conservatives ?
Rallies ?
/\
So now the FBI is going to infiltrate the PTA and start urging and funding violent resistance plots?
/\
\/
I’m sure the
Antifa/BLM/CrisisActor/UninditedCoConspiritor
Division of the FBI
Will be right on top of this soon.
Antifa/BLM/CrisisActor/UninditedCoConspiritor
Division of the FBI
Or
if you prefer
The ABCAUCCFBI
/-(.
All our hero’s are being turned into villains it would seem.
“Violence”, over time, will gradually refer to activities like trespassing, speaking beyond the allocated mike time, implying school policies will have negative results, expressing doubts about the party line, inappropriate facial expressions, wrongthink (silence is violence), and then to support to the policy without sufficient enthusiasm. Finally, it will apply to people who those in charge find offensive or inconvenient or unnecessary, just because.
Thanks Bon of Babble.
Speech LibTaints do not support, they call violence.
Is this the same justice department that allowed rioters to burn our cities for a year?
“And he was once considered qualified for the supreme court?”
No, he wasn’t; he was and is a far-left radical, which is why Obamugabe nominated him. Thank God McConnell and company knew what he was and put the brakes on his nomination.
The crime (& murder) rate in cities is skyrocketing. But crickets from the DOJ. Ditto for riots by ANTIFA (which is “just an idea”) and BLM. Because its much easier to go after LAW ABIDING CITIZENS than actual criminals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.