Posted on 10/04/2021 5:50:57 PM PDT by Enlightened1
After the comprehensive Arizona audit of Maricopa County was completed, Arizona Senator Wendy Rogers unveiled what she called the “new Declaration of Independence” in which 41 state legislators across America called for a 50-state wide 2020 election audit, and should those audits suggest a flawed election, mass decertification of the original 2020 election results, National File previously reported.
“This is our new Declaration of Independence. This is our manifesto of freedom,” Rogers declared.
This comes after the forensic audit of Arizona’s Maricopa County revealed thousands of discrepancies and issues with EV32 and EV33 ballot forms, along with a number of other serious election integrity problems, as National File reported.
Today, the number of state legislators that have signed on to the letter has more than doubled – with 92 signatories joining in calls for election integrity.
92 Legislators from Multiple States Write a Letter to the American People Calling for a 50-State Audit, Decertification Where Appropriate, and Possible Convening of the US House of Representatives
https://twitter.com/WendyRogersAZ/status/1445024591584403466
As National File Senior Reporter Patrick Howley reported on September 28, the number of voters in the 2020 Presidential election in Maricopa County, Arizona “with no record” of their existence far outnumbers the margin of “victory” that Joe Biden supposedly achieved last year, thus putting immense pressure on Arizona Senate President Karen Fann to take action and move to decertify the results of the 2020 election, as the true results of the 2020 political contest appear to be unknown.
“All voters within the Final Voted File, or VM55, was cross-checked against a commercially available data source provided by Melissa called Personator and 86,391 individuals were found with no record in the database for either their name, or anyone with the same last name at the address in the VM55 file,” according to page 56 of the report entitled “Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit: Volume III: Result Details.”
However, constitutional experts across America have indicated that decertification would be sound legal recourse for a corrupted election after-the-fact.
“We are in uncharted territory, but there are a couple of things to point to,” began Eastman. “We can point to the Hawaii Election of 1960, when the Governor subsequently certified another slate of electors after they discovered error in the initial certification.”
“We can point to Section 2 of Title 3 of the United States Code that says when a state has had an election, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, which is, you know, the choice that was made. The assumption was that it was fraudulently given because of illegal votes. The electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such manner as the legislature of such state may direct,” Eastman continued. “So that recognizes the authority of the Legislature to fix a problem.”
“We also have a backdrop of Common Law, which is, when you have a fraud, the actions taken pursuant to the fraud, are unraveled after discovery of the fraud. If the evidence really does come in as definitive, that the election and the electorals cast from Arizona were fraudulently given, and they should have been given in the other direction, then I think there is ample authority to fix this problem,” Eastman said. “We don’t have to live with a fraudulent election.”
The first demand letter to Maricopa County was sent from the Arizona Attorney General’s office asking for multiple documents relating to the election, in what appears to be the start of the investigation from the recently created Elections Integrity Unit following the Arizona audit report being released to the Arizona Senate, National File reported. The evidence included in the AG office’s request includes:
It’s easy for SCOTUS to pull that card now that they have said NO ONE in America has standing in Berg vs. Obama.
They stepped on their foot in 2000 in Gore vs. Bush, so we might actually get sumthin on elections, but I doubt it. SCOTUS isn’t interested in solving problems. They’re interested in attracting attention to themselves and exerting power, a lot like Fauci.
Is it your view that 92 State legislators out of >7300 have standing to do something that the Legislatures they belong to have refused to do?
Do you think that State Legislatures take orders from the Supreme Court, or should?
Is it your view that 92 State legislators out of >7300 have standing to do something that the Legislatures they belong to have refused to do?
***They DID do something. Like the 56 dudes who signed the Declaration of Independence. The state legislators ignore this movement at their own peril. This election-stealing is deeply embedded into the democrap way of doing bizness, they have far more to luze when it gets exposed, it’s a serious issue of political fraud. The way to look at this is how many of those 92 state legislators are republicans vs. democraps, and especially how many on the other side are uniparty RINOs? You ask my view, those are my views, at least some of them.
Do you think that State Legislatures take orders from the Supreme Court, or should?
***When SCOTUS was obviously WRONG like in the Dredd Scott decision, no. There are state legislatures that have declared their states to be sanctuary states from federal SCOTUS-backed illegal-alien laws. What has been done against such states and cities? NOTHING. This is politics playing itself out against an election that was stolen fair and square.
We were in a constitutional crisis in 2008 when the SCOTUS refused to do their job, saying that no one in America had standing against a fraudulent ineligible candidate for president in Berg vs. Obama. These are just the aftershocks, the death throes of a mortally wounded republic.
It is their declaration of independence, as stated in the article. Those original 56 signers of our original declaration had no standing, either. Yet, here we are.
Sometimes [in my view, oftentimes] SCOTUS is simply wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
