Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fatman6502002
Exactly, this is a political battle within the individual states, let the people within their states battle out those political questions. Unfortunately many people here don’t want Constitutional rulings from the USSC, they just want ideological rulings that favor our side.

Don't know the specifics of the Baker case, but if the governor's so-called authority oversteps the Constitution, then it is those who support Baker's actions who don't want constitutional rulings.

19 posted on 10/04/2021 12:17:15 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

The point is this is a state Constitution issue, meaning it is a total state issue the USSC has no jurisdiction in this particular case because there is no Federal interest. When Biden announced his vax mandate, what was the loudest legal argument against the fed gov having such authority? It was that health mandates are, and always have been state issues since the Federal Constitution does not give the fed gov authority over health issues such as mandates. Hence the USSC has no authority to make any ruling on this case so what the USSC just did is 100% Constitutional. To accept the case would have been unConstitutional.


24 posted on 10/04/2021 12:26:24 PM PDT by fatman6502002 ((The Team The Team The Team - Bo Schembechler circa 1969))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson