The Proud Boys story is an unusual act of journalism by The Times. But the mainstreams are just catching up to the story published in June in Revolver News about another alleged FBI informant, the head of the Oath Keepers.
SEE HERE:
Revolver News claims that Stewart Rhodes used his position as head of the Oath Keepers to capture others in a conspiracy of his own making and then skated away from any charges.
Oddly, despite the “shock and awe” prosecutions, Rhodes hasn’t been indicted in the Capitol riot case, but, as the publication noted, it was his actions leading up to the Capitol riot for which his underlings have been charged with conspiracy.
The government has, in effect, built its case against the 16 Oath Keepers in large part by saying “We know you’re guilty of conspiracy because we definitely know your leader Stewart Rhodes is guilty of conspiracy, and it looks like you were following your leader.”
But Stewart Rhodes is not even charged. He is still just “Person One.”
Have fun trying to get a non-partisan jury in D. C.
this word ‘claims’ keeps coming up.
Rhodes is not helping us much, is he, in his quest for control?
So was Stewart Rhodes an Oath Keeper that turned to the dark side and did the dirty work with the CIA/FIB, or was he always working for the CIA/FIB and then infiltrated the Proud Boys and worked his way up to become the president? Surprised this isn’t a huge story.