That’s a more reasonable answer then you’ve given so far here.
Except there is legal precedents for immediate remedy. You would not allow a bank robber to continue to spend the money while waiting for trial.
If this has to go through the court system there has to be some immediate Injunctions.
Which is?
You would not allow a bank robber to continue to spend the money while waiting for trial.
I already answered that.
If this has to go through the court system there has to be some immediate Injunctions.
And that is?
Arizona citizens need to liaison with citizens in those states...will make it easier for the legislators in those states if they have a groundswell, and harder for those legislators to continue to turn a blind eye.
Arizona’s fraud disenfranchises votes elsewhere as well-not just those votes of Arizonans. Fraud in one state impacts the vote nationwide-particularly if Congress in DC is very close to 50-50; a fraudulent state election with fraudulent House races and fraudulent Senate races can deprive the rest of the country of a representative Congress and allows the political,social and financial consequences of electoral and voter fraud to proceed unchallenged and unfettered-basically a “breeder reactor”.
A TRUE “national emergency”
It is for this reason the US Supreme Court has to get involved in this somehow. SC role-among others-is to mediate disputes between states.
Perhaps somehow the SC is the next stop for the Arizona audit data?