1 posted on
09/23/2021 11:32:56 AM PDT by
bitt
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...
2 posted on
09/23/2021 11:33:08 AM PDT by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=50%>)
To: bitt
he needs to recuse himself, plain and simple.
3 posted on
09/23/2021 11:34:16 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
(Let's make crime illegal again!)
To: bitt
On Wednesday, yet another wrinkle came during a Zoom conference when Cooper told parties in the case that he knew Sussmann in the 1990s when both worked for the Justice Department and would consider recusal if either side asked
Good.
He should.
4 posted on
09/23/2021 11:35:50 AM PDT by
Jane Long
(What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 )
To: bitt
6 posted on
09/23/2021 11:39:13 AM PDT by
sport
To: bitt
If John Durham is as going after the whole DC Swamp, including the judges and the lawyers, then what better way to do it than to indict Sussmann at the very end of the Statute of Limitations and then watch the conspirators try to deal with it. Maybe picking the right judge is part of the corruption? One can hope.
7 posted on
09/23/2021 11:39:35 AM PDT by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
To: bitt
Of course this case ends up in front of a rat Judge, of course.
8 posted on
09/23/2021 11:41:17 AM PDT by
gibsonguy
To: bitt
All kinds of snags will be thrown into this case until it is deemed “untry-able.”
9 posted on
09/23/2021 11:51:16 AM PDT by
fwdude
(If you don’t think you are in a battle w/ the culture for your children then you are already losing.)
To: bitt
Oh good grief! It just gets better all the time.
To: bitt
No, why would he?
Impressions of impropriety you say, well too bad, they are all democrats so the rules don’t apply.
12 posted on
09/23/2021 12:09:34 PM PDT by
TexasM1A
To: bitt
Democrats can do as they please. All federal crimes will be tried in DC, and you all know what the jury pool consists of (hint — they ain’t republicans).
To: bitt
If I'm reading this properly, the judge admitted his own connection to Sussmann, but not his wife's connection to the larger charges?
And, rather than step up and decide for himself to recuse, he's leaving it to the lawyers to ask him to recuse?
What is his problem with not recusing of his own volition? Why does he need to be asked to? Is that some kind of CYA move?
16 posted on
09/23/2021 12:48:55 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: bitt
Conflicts of interest only apply to the little people and conservatives.
17 posted on
09/23/2021 1:33:08 PM PDT by
CatOwner
(Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021)
To: Fedora; MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
Check out the connections here
19 posted on
10/02/2021 1:08:14 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: Fedora; MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
Check out the connections here
20 posted on
10/02/2021 1:08:16 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: bitt; Fedora
Cooper was also the judge in a Benghazi case
21 posted on
10/02/2021 1:10:52 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: bitt
What did Christopher Cooper do before he became a judge? There was a radical dem by the same name who headed a group or company called Potomac Square
22 posted on
10/02/2021 1:15:10 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson