ClearCase_guy wrote: “Still seems like a Nuremberg violation. Forcing experimental drugs on soldiers is a No No.”
First, Nuremburg is not a part of US code. If you doubt that, then show me where it’s been incorporated into US law by either legislative act or by treaty.
Second, the vaccines are not ‘experimental’ despite all the anti-vaxxer propaganda.
“Second, the vaccines are not ‘experimental’ despite all the anti-vaxxer propaganda.” >>> I’m not anti-vax, but I am anti-mRNA shot. God made my cells to work as He designed, not as some mad scientist decided.
First the Nuremberg Code is HUGE, and not something to dismiss. This was about the Holocaust and how you treat human beings. This is what agreed by the Allies after WWII. For you to dismiss it says a lot about you.
Oh and just because you got lied to by the fake stream news about what was approved. It was a continuation of the EUA. The only thing FDA approved was Comirnaty that is not even production.
People are anti medical tyranny, coercion and not anti-vaccine. Most people that question this have had many vaccines.
I’ve listened to people whose job is to understand what the FDA approved, and they are all saying it was not approved. You have been duped once again.
That’s a stretch.
These “vaccines” are most certainly an experiment, normal testing & safety protocols have not been performed. The number of “vaccine” induced side effects & deaths from each of these formulations would have seen the removal of any prior vaccine.
Opinions are fine but downright spin is appalling and delegitimizes the scientific method.