Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dershowitz: SCOTUS Likely To Rule Against Biden Vaccine Mandate
OANN ^ | Sep 13 2021 | OAN Newsroom

Posted on 09/22/2021 2:02:57 PM PDT by uzumaki_naruto

State lawmakers and corporate attorneys have been chomping at the bit to take the Biden administration to court after the new vaccine mandates. Biden announced executive changes last week, which would reportedly affect 100 million Americans.

........................

“Already we’ve had companies and states indicate they are going to file suit. This is going to be a big payday for lawyers unfortunately, but it will get the case to court right away,” he stated. “I suspect that within a month, the Supreme Court will issue a preliminary decision on whether or not a president, as distinguished in Congress, can impose a near universal mandate.”

..............

For Dershowitz, the mandate should be not be “done under the rubric of emergency, but rather under the rubric of or ordinary congressional power.”

(Excerpt) Read more at oann.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alandershowitz; covid19; covidstooges; dershowitz; flubras; flubros; mandate; thedersh; vaccine; vaccinemandate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
Has this case gone to the Supreme Court yet? At my work, they are waiting for instructions as to how they implement this mandate.
1 posted on 09/22/2021 2:02:57 PM PDT by uzumaki_naruto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto

“likely”

So who will shaft the Constitution and freedom this time? Roberts? Barrett?


2 posted on 09/22/2021 2:05:40 PM PDT by dynachrome ("I will not be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto

It doesn’t matter what they say or “rule”

I am NOT taking the jab. They can all go eff themselves!

F U JOE!


3 posted on 09/22/2021 2:06:02 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto

I doubt SCOTUS would rule on the merits anytime soon. What will happen is that some litigant will request an injunction to keep the government from carrying out the forced vaccinations while a suit is in progress, which could foreseeably make its way up to SCOTUS in a relatively short time.


4 posted on 09/22/2021 2:06:37 PM PDT by DarrellZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto

The real fireworks are going to come around Thanksgiving when the government employees start getting pink slips. I’d sooner pick up a grizzly bear cub in front of its mother than be the guy handing out pink slips to offices full of government civilians.


5 posted on 09/22/2021 2:08:50 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto

The problem is the ‘Karen court’ of our culture.
This is a nation whose men are allowing people who can’t understand normal thinking run it.

People who buy crap like this. A virtue signaling door mat.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08CMQJCXV?pf_rd_r=QTGX83ZQYH4P4S2PFPKP&pf_rd_p=8fe9b1d0-f378-4356-8bb8-cada7525eadd&pd_rd_r=12c71a82-a56b-4de7-9a4c-d595d5801fd3&pd_rd_w=kWKMQ&pd_rd_wg=QXJEc&ref_=pd_gw_unk


6 posted on 09/22/2021 2:10:38 PM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto

States can issue vaccine rules. Not the Federal Govt


7 posted on 09/22/2021 2:13:16 PM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto

It doesn’t matter. The rule will be used against a lot of people that the liberals want to get out of government and the military before the Supreme Court can find against it. Monies will be spent and advisors hired with big payouts.

They knew it would cause a big scream from the whole country but it keeps the front papers clean of Afghanistan.


8 posted on 09/22/2021 2:17:20 PM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto
Has this case gone to the Supreme Court yet?

No. I think it needs to work its way through the lower courts first.

9 posted on 09/22/2021 2:23:02 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

The Federales are claiming that it is a workplace safety rule and claim that it is a workplace safety issue.


10 posted on 09/22/2021 2:23:25 PM PDT by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jz638

“Going postal”


11 posted on 09/22/2021 2:24:46 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto

Sure wish someone would make an emergency appeal to the SCOTUS or State SC. My corp is pressing their thumb down on employees ever since that Biden babble of a Covid speech.

This whole vaccine mandate needs to be put to rest once and for all. No one should be forced to receive this jab. No one should have to have a covid passport. That’s insane.


12 posted on 09/22/2021 2:24:57 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uzumaki_naruto

This is going to take months to unpack. OSHA hasn’t even published the rule yet. As soon as they do the lawsuits will be filed


13 posted on 09/22/2021 2:30:04 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

If it were they could not exempt companies with less their 100 employees.

It violates the equal protection clause as well as the whole suppose rational for an “emergency temporary order”

IF this crisis is so sever it requires this sort of extordianry action, it must be applied universally

A workplace does not magically change from safe to unsafe when you add that 100th employee


14 posted on 09/22/2021 2:33:25 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

“States can issue vaccine rules. Not the Federal Govt”

Only if these State rules do not violate the U.S. Constitution bill of rights. Those are there to protect us from a tyrannical local state.

And States signed a contract to uphold these basic rights when they joined the union. Many are now in breach of contract...


15 posted on 09/22/2021 2:37:48 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

There are rules within OSHA that are based on company size. Per OSHA, there are regulations that don’t apply to small companies but do apply to larger companies.
This is mostly a barrier to keep small companies from becoming large and it also explains why the mandate can apply only to companies with 100 or more employees.


16 posted on 09/22/2021 2:37:57 PM PDT by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

No that an apples to oranges comparison that does not fit

ordinary rules subject to the ordinary review and oversite person are not the same thing as an emergency rule

The justification for this emergency rule contradicts the 100 employee cut off

Because the rule being written contradicts the justification for the rule, it most likely, like most OSHA emergency orders, will be struck down by the Courts


17 posted on 09/22/2021 2:47:01 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Then so are colds, flu, HSV, HPV, AIDS, Athlete’s Foot, etc.


18 posted on 09/22/2021 2:48:26 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

I’m not taking it either.

They’re acting like it’s the mark of the Beast trying to control if you can buy or work.

It’s not the Mark of the Beast of course. But this is setting the stage and it’s 🌎🌍 world-wide which is an attention-getter. 😳😷🤯🥺


19 posted on 09/22/2021 2:54:31 PM PDT by SaveFerris (The Lord, The Christ, and The Messiah: Jesus Christ of Nazareth - http://www.BiblicalJesusChrist.Com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

That’s news to me. I’ve worked in the metalworking industry for 40 years. I’ve never seen a employment (size) limit affecting OSHA regs.


20 posted on 09/22/2021 2:55:20 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson