Posted on 09/17/2021 12:45:17 PM PDT by janetjanet998
JUST IN: FDA advisory panel soundly rejects a plan to offer Pfizer booster shots against COVID-19 to most Americans - AP
Biden and his handlers desperately want Biden to be seen as the Covid Savior. It’s the reason he must be seen as the guiding light on all things Covid. He (or his administration) must stipulate boosters to save people, approve any and all treatments and control the distribution of said approved treatments, and whatever else is needed to balance his other disasters.
“I watched it.”
Watched what, if I may ask?
Victim of it today being a non-vaxxer. Blamed for spreading covid to the vacci ated. I asked the guy if he was vaccinated against the measles and rubella and polio. He said yes. I ask why the hell if he is innoculated against all those vaccines and I came up to him with all those diseases if he would still be afraid since I was carrier. He said yes. So i asked him why he is wasting his time getting vaccinated at all since apparently none of them work? I guess I will have to start yelling out “unclean!”
It would be funny but it’s too real.
yup, not the Bee
The FDA panel discuss the booster. Then vote on it. Q and A.
Ding! Ding! Winner!
From your tweet link......
Fynn-derella
@Fynnderella1
·
7h
My guess is that they will approve it for 65 and over and those with health problems. They can hide mortality and severe adverse events in that age group blaming comorbidities, but it’s harder to explain it in the younger age group.
This is a segment from the FDA call today, queued up to Dr. Herch:
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee – 9/17/2021
https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=15612&v=WFph7-6t34M&feature=youtu.be
Time to start: 4 hours, 20 minutes and a few seconds. It goes about three minutes. The person before him also hits good points.
Good slides there!
they still recommend it for citizens over 65 though
that’s CNN trying to spin the fact they voted AGAINST it for those under 65
Thank you!
That’s what long-term clinical trials are for. Participants and carefully screened and fully informed of all possible risks. They have to sign a consent. They are also informed they may or may not be in the control group meaning they may or may not receive the drug. They are monitored very closely. Any deviation can cause the study to be thrown out. Also participants are allowed to opt out at any time. This was not done with Covid jabs
Look how the media is reporting this news. Is all you need to know how interested they are in medical truths.
I don’t recognize the FDA as having any legitimate authority whatsoever as the Constitution delegates NO enumerated power to the feds to regulate healthcare.
DISMANTLE the 80%+ unconstitutional portion of the feds.
The news chimps never seem to mention the biggest flaw with “boosters.”
Such shots are still engineered based on THE ORIGINAL VIRUS. Sounds like an ideal way to drive further mutations if rolled out throughout the entire populace.
Might be a good idea for those at highest risk of hospitalization, but to keep doing this to young, healthy children and adults is completely irrational.
In the old days, a vaccine booster meant getting another dose of the inactivated virus. A+A
The mRNA “vaccines” were developed in a few hours using computer modelling to come up with the right RNA code to trigger the response of the body’s DNA. To create a “spike protein”.
Are the mRNA “boosters” the same thing as before (the same mRNA code) or is it a reworked mRNA code based on the recent Delta Variant?? So instead of A+A it is A+B?
If it is the later it will be like getting monthly updates to your Microsoft virus software package.
Are the cool kids suppose to be anti vax now? Or not yet? This collectivism is so confusing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.