[dfwgator]

Of course it begs the question. Why should I hire anyone who was too lazy to work for the last year and a half?

[cgbg]

These “lazy” folks have two attributes that make them strong candidates:

—They are good at math. They figured out they made more money not working than working.

—They understood marginal utility. They understood that leisure time has a value. That will help them understand their customers.

[billyboy15]

“Of course it begs the question. Why should I hire anyone who was too lazy to work for the last year and a half?”

You shouldn’t.

[1Old Pro]

Of course it begs the question. Why should I hire anyone who was too lazy to work for the last year and a half?

Good observation, especially in today's world where employees are more concerned with time off than performance and loyalty. That's why I generally place my bets on people with experience who have demonstrated their value, often people over 50 years old who are typically extremely dependable, knowledgeable, adaptable and willing to get the job done.

[precisionshootist]

"Of course it begs the question. Why should I hire anyone who was too lazy to work for the last year and a half?"

Which in turn begs the question why would ANYONE displaying your level of contempt and ignorance want to work for you?

[eyeamok]

Why should I hire anyone who was too lazy to work for the last year and a half?

And that will be the big question on the minds of employers, I know it would be on mine

[EEGator]

Soon you’ll have a pick of millions that got fired for not taking the “vaccine” instead.