[GregNH]

I came across this website a few months ago. Ordered her book but have yet to read it, it's on my list... Her main page is “The Towers didn’t burn up, nor did they slam to the ground. They turned (mostly) to dust in mid air.”

The whole dust thing bothered me for years but I never thought about it the way Judy has. The actual evidence that she presents is irrefutable.

A little background. I am a retired engineer, mechanical/structural, and traveled for work. I flew out on 9/10 from BOS. One of my friends worked for SG&H out of Cambridge at the time. Sometime later they were contracted by an insurance company to determine if the collapse of WTC1 was caused by the collapse of WTC2. In conversations with him it basically boiled down to no conclusive evidence of what caused either one to collapse. Judy points out the lack of seismic evidence of a building of that size would cause, which was the insurance claim.

Her site has slides, videos and documents. You can find other videos of her doing symposiums at different times with a internet search, I have watched them all.

Empirical evidence of what happened to ALL 7 of WTC buildings.

9-11 9/11 WTC1 WTC2 WTC7

[SlipperySlope99]

Thanks for posting this it’s the first time I’ve come across this analysis of what happened to the WTC towers on 9/11. I’ll spend my downtime this weekend checking out her website.

[basalt]

anything that has jessie ventura involved is pure lunacy...

[null and void]

Amusing thing I saw on one of my rare TV watching spasms:

A show on Nikola Tesla.

Segment on his ‘earthquake machine’ a thumper that periodically excited a structure at its resonant frequency.
The claim was that when Tesla tried it, the entire building he mounted in on started to shake and he wisely stopped, the declared he could bring down NYC with a similar unit.

Cut to a commercial showing one of the WTC towers disintegrating...

[Fred Nerks]

Agreed, I watched the towers turn into dust, was astonished at the 'melted cars'

Anyone who takes the time to study the work of Judy Wood will never be able to accept the official version.

[Rockingham]

My problem with these kinds of presentations is that they do not offer a clear thesis with an organized body of evidence and argument in support of it. Instead, the authors profess credentials and expertise and deliver a mass of material and insist that it proves something or other amounting to nothing more than seemingly ominous questions and suspicions.

You may be a retired engineer, but I am a retired lawyer with a late in life career shift to professional political research. I know BS and BS artists all too well. For many years, my living depended on detecting lies and ferreting out and proving the truth.

Lack of clarity is a sign that someone is running a con or is a fool. On provocative and troubling subjects, both abound.

When reinforced concrete fails under overwhelming stress, it breaks up into dust, concrete fragments, and twisted rebar. Aside from the size of the WTC and the horror of the 9/11 attack, no one has shown me anything in the failure of the WTC that contradicts physics, engineering, and common sense.