Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/06/2021 11:46:20 AM PDT by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: NoLibZone

Let’s hope this judge doesn’t rule on Oncology patients who often sign and receive experimental drugs. Jerk.


51 posted on 09/06/2021 12:47:30 PM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone
The judge is right. We can't allow this to happen again with the potential loss of billions of dollars and bruised ego's over a cheap cure!

====================================================================================================

After judge orders hospital to use experimental Covid-19 treatment, woman recovers

“This lady was on a ventilator, literally on her deathbed, before she was given this drug,” Lorigo told The Buffalo News about Smentkiewicz, a Cheektowaga resident. “As far as we’re concerned, the judge’s order saved this woman’s life.”

On Jan. 2, Smentkiewicz was given her first dose of Ivermectin, and according to court papers filed by her family, she made “a complete turnaround.” “In less than 48 hours, my mother was taken off the ventilator, transferred out of the Intensive Care Unit, sitting up on her own and communicating,” Kulbacki said in a court affidavit."

Judge orders Ivermectin treatment-woman recovers

53 posted on 09/06/2021 12:53:59 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

She needs to find another facility perhaps hospice and sign him out AMA. If there is any chance for him to survive at all he has to get out of that hospital.


56 posted on 09/06/2021 12:58:15 PM PDT by lastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone
“...public policy should not and does not support allowing a physician to ‘try’ any type of treatment on human beings,”

This is factually wrong. There are some types of treatment public policy permits physicians to try. Specifically Remdesivir is permitted because the very politically connected pharmaceutical company Gilead charges 3000 bucks a pop. Remdesivir doesn't have any demonstrated tendency to save the lives of those who use it though, so that can't be the reason for the policy. Ivermeticin on the other had is dirt cheap. Sure it has a tendency to save the life of those who need it, but when it does the well connected pharmaceutical company does not get a big pay off because the patient does not get sick enough to be prescribed Remdesivir.

Public health policy is about making money for the friends of those in power. It is so outrageous that this woman would try to selfishly steal from the revenue of big pharma and secondarily the bribes of the our political overlords....all because she wants her husband to live. Look everybody wants their spouse to live and all that, but that is no damn excuse to go cheating politicians and big pharma. For shame! For shame!

64 posted on 09/06/2021 1:07:46 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

If someone I know is admitted to the hospital with Covid I will be sneaking some Ivermectin in to them asap. If I get caught what are they going to do - put me in jail? Even if they did that’s a small price to save a life.


73 posted on 09/06/2021 2:14:51 PM PDT by POWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

So why can’t this wife move her husband to a place that does use Ivermectin?


76 posted on 09/06/2021 2:24:04 PM PDT by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone
...public policy should not and does not support allowing a physician to ‘try’ any type of treatment on human beings

Did he ban the use of puberty blockers on children for the purpose of transitioning them to another gender? Hormone treatments have NEVER been approved for this purpose, yet it's done every day.

77 posted on 09/06/2021 2:24:15 PM PDT by Brookhaven (The dystopian future is now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

ivermectin, an anti-parasitic medication with no proven effectiveness against the novel coronavirus
..........................................
An easily provable falsehood since there are numerous medically confirmed cases and studies of the efficacy of Ivermectin all over the internet! More fake news from the fake news media! Those morons never give up spreading falsehoods!


78 posted on 09/06/2021 2:25:49 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat ("It is in the region of ignorance that tyranny begins." Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

Hospital follows CDC Protocol(failures for 19 months backing it), they are IMMUNE to lawsuits and your death has been incentivized for using a ventilator(95% death rates, known since Wuhan first tried them).

“Section VII. Limitations on Distribution
The Secretary may specify that liability protections are in effect only for Covered Countermeasures obtained through a particular means of distribution. The Declaration previously stated that liability immunity is afforded to Covered Persons only for Recommended Activities related to (a) present or future federal contracts, cooperative agreements, grants, other transactions, interagency agreements, or memoranda of understanding or other federal agreements; or (b) activities authorized in accordance with the public health and medical response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction to prescribe, administer, deliver, distribute, or dispense the Covered Countermeasures following a declaration of an emergency.

COVID-19 is an unprecedented global challenge that requires a whole-of-nation response that utilizes federal-, state-, and local- distribution channels as well as private-distribution channels. Given the broad scale of this pandemic, the Secretary amends the Declaration to extend PREP Act coverage to additional private-distribution channels, as set forth below.

The amended Section VII adds that PREP Act liability protections also extend to Covered Persons for Recommended Activities that are related to any Covered Countermeasure that is:

licensed, approved, cleared, or authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (or that is permitted to be used under an Investigational New Drug Application or an Investigational Device Exemption) under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act or Public Health Service (PHS) Act to treat, diagnose, cure, prevent, mitigate or limit the harm from COVID–19, or the transmission of SARS–CoV–2 or a virus mutating therefrom; or

a respiratory protective device approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under 42 CFR part 84, or any successor regulations, that the Secretary determines to be a priority for use during a public health emergency declared under section 319 of the PHS Act to prevent, mitigate, or limit the harm from, COVID–19, or the transmission of SARS–CoV–2 or a virus mutating therefrom.”
https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/prepact/Pages/4-PREP-Act.aspx

More about the above assertions:
“You want to know why, if you get Covid-19, the doctor and hospital won’t prescribe and use anything until you’re choking — and then only Dexamethasone, Remdesivir (which has failed twice in random controlled trials, including a VERY LARGE one, and is dangerous enough, on the data, that I’d never take it personally), oxygen, and ultimately a ventilator?

Here’s the reason directly from the government itself on an official government web page:”
http://market-ticker.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=243448


79 posted on 09/06/2021 2:36:58 PM PDT by JCL3 (As Richard Feynman might have said, this is reality taking precedence over public relations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone
The author graduated last December from the University of Missouri Journalism School. I just wrote this to her...
Sarah…in your article today “Judge: Patient's wife cannot force UC West Chester to treat COVID-19 patient with ivermectin,” you wrote “…ivermectin, [is] an anti-parasitic medication with no proven effectiveness against the novel coronavirus.”

Would you please cite your source for this assertion?

While you are looking that up, you may want to read “Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19” in the American Journal of Therapeutics, April 22, 2021. The authors conclusion:

“Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.”
The data are not hard to understand. I urge you to start digging more deeply into a topic before writing about it. You can find many other such examples in other countries.

Did the Mizzou J-School not teach you how to do investigative reporting?

I pasted Figures 1 & 4 from the American Journal of Therapeutics paper into my mail as well.
82 posted on 09/06/2021 3:12:42 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Criminal democrats kill babies. Do you think anything else is a problem for them?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

Crime committed:
Chose the wrong death cult hospital

Sentenced:
Death of a loved one.

Bill:
Payable on receipt suckers


83 posted on 09/06/2021 3:13:52 PM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NoLibZone

Attorney Ralph Lorigo has gone to court to force hospitals to give ivermectin to vented patients. 12 times. He won court orders 11 times. 9 of those patients are now home and the 10th is rapidly improving on ivermectin.

We need to connect this woman to this attorney


89 posted on 09/06/2021 10:47:30 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson