Posted on 09/04/2021 2:00:15 PM PDT by Candor7
““The order issued Monday, Aug. 23 is hereby modified to permit the defendant (the hospital) to cease administration of Ivermectin, at its discretion, if Mr. Smith’s treating physicians at West Chester Hospital determine that Mr. Smith is experiencing any life -hreatening side effects due to administration of Ivermectin,” Oster wrote.”
I don’t see he problem here. By the court order according to the article, it states if the patient is not getting life threatening side effects from the use of the drug, then its continued use is up to the discretion of the attending physician. However, if the patient is doing fine and improving with the use, then it can be continued. If the physician takes him off the drug, and the patient lapses into failure and dies, then the doctors can be prosecuted.
A doctor may be held criminally liable only when the evidence establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that the doctor’s treatment created a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the patient would die, medical malpractice.
But another thought is if the patient lapses due to the withdrawing of the drug, and the doctor stands to the decision to remove its use and not restart it if time allows, and it should, there is a possible murder charge.
wy69
Money might not even be needed. Mere ill will might suffice.
Exhibit A (see link):
from https://twitter.com/GraduatedBen/status/1433067868678131712?s=19
He is lucky to still be alive.
“Ivermectin has powerful antitumor effects, including the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenic activity, in a variety of cancer cells. This may be related to the regulation of multiple signaling pathways by ivermectin through PAK1 kinase.
On the other hand, ivermectin promotes programmed cancer cell death, including apoptosis, autophagy and pyroptosis. Ivermectin induces apoptosis and autophagy is mutually regulated. Interestingly, ivermectin can also inhibit tumor stem cells and reverse multidrug resistance and exerts the optimal effect when used in combination with other chemotherapy drugs.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You accusations that going to the hospital is wrong because there is financial reassure is as dangerous as distasteful. And a flat out lie.
Interesting assertion. Last time I was in the emergency room (for Bell's Palsy, not COVID-19) I was tested for COVID-19, and the result was negative. I asked, if I was positive, what the care plan for a COVID-19 infection was. They said isolation in a COVID-19 ward, with observation. When I asked what the medication protocol was, they said "Nothing." I asked the usual questions: "We are not allowed to prescribe or provide those drugs to you." This is a corporate hospital, by the way, following the CDC/NIH dicta.
I had asked my doctors the same question, with pretty much the same answer. One said "hey, you are on blood thinners [for another reason] so you shouldn't be affected by the vaccines." (Note that he said "vaccines", not "COVID")
When pressed, the doctors mumbled that the administration was afraid of lawsuits, and CMS withholding payment on insurance claims (Medicare patient).
So there is plenty of incentive to kill people: avoiding lawsuits and avoiding denied claims. In other words, follow the money.
I'll be one to stay isolated at home. I'm the only one living here, so there is no chance of my passing on an infection to others.
Wonderful graphic. And the research defines the docking effect here:
***********************************************
Abstract and Figures
“Background/aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2.
Materials and methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study.
Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08.
Conclusion: The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.”
Amen. I resemble your emarks.
That’s a FAKE NEWS headline.
The chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association made that recommendation. He does not speak for Japan or the government of Japan.
And he made that recommendation earlier in the year.
- see https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-japanese-medical-association-chairman-tells-doctors-to-prescribe-ivermectin-for-covid/
Sorry its “Fake News.....but the fact of the Tokyo anouncement speaks volumes for the effectiveness of Ivermectin based therapy.
And they recalled the Moderna vaccine.
Look, malaria is controlled by freely distributed medication in tablet form.
All we need is a clear understanding on how to use Ivermectin as propylaxis and early treatment the same way malaria is controlled in many tropical countries.
You find that Info. for understanding is right here:
Its not rocket science. This “pandemic,: could easily be controlled by over the counter availbility of Ivermectin, just like malaria is controlled in many countries.
What we need is a modicum of freedom from the Public Health System, which we are NOT getting. The public health system has no restraints in place dedicated to preserving a base line of freedom and liberty. They are a real threat to our nation, which they want to convert into a totalitarian bio state, aty the behest of Big Pharm , like Pfizer who have asked some small nations for their military bases as collateral for supplying the vaccine to them. These are not your ordinary, benign Pharmaceutical companies anymore.
Its simple. Release the Ivermectin!
Indeed...screw the kraken, release the ivermectin!
An aside.
I once screwed a kraken, like many of us have. It took a while to find her and our relationship was short lived.
I avoided them henceforth.No need to continuously test one's manhood, LOL. But many public health physicians turn into kraken the moment you say the word , "Ivermectin." And so ny their lights do we know them.
I see no problem with ivermectin being used, as long as people understand that it does not work for everyone, and that there needs to be a Plan B if it does not work.
I do think that one of the best things that people could do is to lose some weight and get exercise. A lot of it starts with curtailing snacking and portion control. Since when do muffins need to be size of softballs?
wonder why wife hasn’t asked for hospice?
He is a troll. Let him keep pushing and his blindness to public health, lock step political correctness on behalf of Big Pharm will bring him the ZOT.
Like all trolls , just give him enough rope and he will hang himself.
I am waiting for the fatal post, then he can ride the lightning.
wonder why wife hasn’t asked for hospice?>>>>>>>>>>>
Dr. Wagshul of “critical Allaince” , Dr. Pierre Kory’s group is advising her. Together they are forceing the hospitals hand , should he die, they will lose a few million dollars for negligence and for the violation of patient rights.
Smith will therefore likely survive.
Thanx. I get it. Hope it’s not too late.
We’ll find out. I will be following the story and will post here.
I know. My doctor put my entire family on Ivermectin when my younger son (age 27) tested positive. We got Ivermectin pills from CVS.
Somebody needs to protect us from the medical profession.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.