Did anyone read the actual ruling? The ruling was that the lawsuit was not properly structured. Had nothing to do with the law itself but that the plaintiffs were suing the law itself trying to get it suspended. The court rejected the request for an emergency suspension of the law.
They neither confirmed not denied the law itself. This was rejected on procedural technicalities.
They neither confirmed not denied the law itself. This was rejected on procedural technicalities.Does not affect The Narrative of the Week. If for any reason even one baby is protected for one instant, it's left wing hysteria time.
“Did anyone read the actual ruling?’
You, I and few others. Why break FReeper tradition?/s