Yes, I did. In fact, I was up late waiting for this since the justices had yet to officially act on it after a day of the law of being in effect, so I knew it was likely to be juicy.
BTW, I read almost everything that comes out of SCOTUS, so pull that crap with someone else. I’m tired of the “fair and balanced” games you try to play. Sometimes they just don’t apply.
This forum doesn’t have an ignore button, but I will never reply to you again. On anything. Good day.
Good grief.
Your initial post was:
“No surprise scumbag Roberts was one of the four dissenters.”
and then after I asked posters what the reasons were for Robert’s dissent, you ignored that question. Completely. But your choice!
The knee jerk reactions by so many about Roberts regarding this case really does indicate that very few understand the reasons for his dissent. People can think Roberts is a squish (I do regarding many of his opinions) -and- try to understand his dissent.
And “polite and respectful” is more what I hope for on certain FR threads such as subjects like COVID-19, when threads sometimes devolve into FReepers on both sides hoping those on the other side get sick.
Re: ignore - thank you for explaining.