I showed you information on which countries produce opium for the legal market. They produce more than enough for the world.
You have not shown any proof of your position and your feelings about the subject just don't cut it.
The bottom line is, you have no idea what you're talking about and you're just making chit up.
“I did not use the word ‘illicit.’
Perhaps you should read the sites you post to represent your point.
“Clandestine Heroin Laboratory in Afghanistan
“In 2010 groups in Afghanistan produced 90 percent of the world’s illicit opium, using clandestine labs well hidden in the country’s topography.”
https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/drug_of_abuse.pdf
Also in your article:
“Currently, there are three main sources for illegal opium: Burma, Afghanistan, and Colombia. Opium and heroin are ideal trade products–they are in great demand, are very profitable to produce...”
You’ll notice the word “trade” was in there. Since they are trading, can you say without a doubt that the drugs being traded aren’t somehow ending up in American pharmas when wholesalers in India, Turkey and Australia could just be changing the labels? It’s been done before.
You are too trusting. There is way too much money on the float and you have little information to be sure. Also, you might have asked me to go back and find more information I copied and pasted before calling me a liar saying I didn’t know what I was talking about and making stuff up when you have no idea who I am, and what I have done.
Good luck. I won’t be answering any more of your posts as I don’t have the time to waste nor the desire to be verbally insulted by a person that doesn’t consider the lawlessness of people in the world. And attacking the messenger when you can’t disprove the point of a conjecture is an old liberal trick to deflect the possibilities which may not come into your favor. That provides me nothing and you less.
wy69