Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pfflier

Your O-5 may have committed this crime while on active duty, I presume, which makes it logical that he could be called back for court martial. I still wonder about a retiree who is already released from ready reserve and out for say, two decades (y’know, just asking for a friend). Your excerpt from the code (thanks, btw), as I read it, does say a Regular Army officer, retired, can be recalled to active duty to be punished for calling some doofuses doofuses. If they don’t go after Kurt Schlichter, though, they are not likely to go after anybody. If they do take on the Vodkapundit, they’ll surely have their hands full. Love to see his column almost certain to come about just this issue.


189 posted on 08/29/2021 1:50:29 PM PDT by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: StAntKnee
Yup, the O-5 was on active duty when he did commit the actions for which he was charged. His civilian lawyer was fighting the recall because his client had served his 30 years at retirement.

After conviction and judgement he lost at the Court of Military Appeals. The real issue became retirement pay O-5 vs O-3 so the ambulance chaser could get a bugger cut.

190 posted on 08/29/2021 2:36:02 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson