Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rittenhouse defense objects to efforts to get donor identities as state looks to bar donors from jury
Kenosha Times ^ | Aug 24, 2021 | Deneen Smih

Posted on 08/24/2021 10:29:50 PM PDT by Jacob Kell

Defense attorneys for Kyle Rittenhouse are objecting to a state request for identities of people who donated to Rittenhouse’s defense or who purchased branded merchandise supporting the teen.

Rittenhouse, now 18, is accused of killing two men and seriously injuring a third during the unrest following the police shooting of Jacob Blake in August 2020. He is charged with first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide and attempted first-degree intentional homicide in the Aug. 25, 2020, incident.

(Excerpt) Read more at kenoshanews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Illinois; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: banglist; bidenvoters; kenosha; kylerittenhouse; rittenhouse; rittenouse; wisconsin
Does this Binger guy have any financial backing from Soros? Does the have ant political ties of interest?
1 posted on 08/24/2021 10:29:50 PM PDT by Jacob Kell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
The Rittenhouse prosecutors are plain evil.

There will be a reckoning for this kind of Mitt in the future.

2 posted on 08/24/2021 10:38:09 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

That’s a good question because the prosecutor’s stated reason is BS, that can be entirely addressed on the jury pool questionnaire and in voir dire.

So why is this putz fishing for data and who asked him to try and get it.


3 posted on 08/24/2021 10:39:46 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Using hat flawed logic you can come to the conclusion that it is reasonable and justifiable to ban welfare recipients from jury duty because they get income directly from the state and are therefor compromised and biased.


4 posted on 08/24/2021 10:41:10 PM PDT by WMarshal (The Pleasant American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

All of that would be an obligation of the jurors to reveal during voir dire, and the prosecution knows it. All they’re doing is trying to assemble a target list for retribution through leaks and doxxing.


5 posted on 08/24/2021 10:43:00 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

“That’s a good question because the prosecutor’s stated reason is BS, that can be entirely addressed on the jury pool questionnaire and in voir dire.”

Yes.

They want the names for other reasons.


6 posted on 08/24/2021 10:52:28 PM PDT by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Throw darts at an open phone book to pick a jury.

Or snatch the next 12 people that walk past the courthouse...


7 posted on 08/24/2021 11:11:17 PM PDT by Bobalu (The higher the monkey climbs, the more you see his ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Whoever donated to his defense will probably be put on some list, hopefully not a domestic terrorist list. Scary times.


8 posted on 08/24/2021 11:50:06 PM PDT by KittyKares (I miss President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

>> The Rittenhouse prosecutors are plain evil.

Marxist scum


9 posted on 08/25/2021 12:17:50 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

I hope the prosecution gets what it wants....It sets the idea in stone for any other prosecutor to go after lib donors of all kinds...... It has to be both ways.....Can you imagine the libs going to the supreme court and saying these laws are only for dems..... Although the way things are going at SCOTUS?????


10 posted on 08/25/2021 12:34:55 AM PDT by Hambone 1934 (Dems love playing Nazis.....The republicans love helping them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

“snatch the next 12 people that walk past the courthouse...”

Some will be walking to their cars having been exonerated from their felonies...


11 posted on 08/25/2021 1:55:17 AM PDT by Does so (USA is run from 2446 Belmont Rd, NW, DC, (Kalorama). Why else the 9/11 deadline for Afghanistan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jz638
It IS the way our judicial system works and Satan has been patient embedding his minions all throughout the American fabric.

We are tattered, torn and disintegrating like battery acid leaked on our clothes.

The enemy knows it has more of theirs to choose from than we do and they know they can object or select to jurors presented.

Many years in the making (IMO, thanks to public school), the selection pool is vastly larger for the enemy than for us.

They will get the jury they want and fry Rittenhouse.

We are put on notice, America ....

Stop meme-ing about investing in guns, brass, and MRE's and start REALLY talking with God about whether you will kill your neighbor if and when the time comes.


12 posted on 08/25/2021 3:17:17 AM PDT by knarf (qa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Isn’t this what voir dire is for...?


13 posted on 08/25/2021 3:21:42 AM PDT by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jz638

Several things come to mind with this request.

1. The court could require the list of donors be broken down by donors living in the area where jurors will be selected from and then the judge can screen the prospective jurors in camera. The judge could then privately question the prospective jurors about prejudice and remove them from the jury pool.

2. Voir dire would obviously be the best way to vet the potential jurors.

3. As we saw with the jury selection in Chauvin’s trial, having made an initial decision about guilt or innocence of the defendant can be overcome with attestation that the juror would be open minded.

Obviously the prosecutor wants the list so that it can be leaked to the media, BLM and Antifa. They want to dry up his defense fund going forward.


14 posted on 08/25/2021 3:39:04 AM PDT by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
“The State would request that upon that inspection, the Court disclose to the State the names of any Kenosha County residents who have donated to the defendant’s legal defense funds. Even if those individuals are not part of the jury pool in this case, it is possible that their relatives or associates may be, and the State would like the opportunity to investigate that if necessary,” Binger wrote.

This is incredible. This prosecutor needs to be disbarred.

15 posted on 08/25/2021 3:47:34 AM PDT by CW_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
But no charges for the felon in possession of a firearm that most certainly wanted to kill Rittenhouse.


16 posted on 08/25/2021 5:02:32 AM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Want to bet that this Binger is looking to use the case as a stepping stone to higher positions?


17 posted on 08/25/2021 9:15:04 AM PDT by Jacob Kell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson