The masks box even admits it does not protect you from Covid.
If the masks work, then how come we are going back vs. taking a "vaccine"?
We are governed by retards.
The same Governor who signed bill to do away with math, science and history high school graduation requirements because they discriminate against POC. I guess this proves she doesn’t believe in science because requiring masks outdoors does not help and may actually contribute to other health problems.
Further proof that Kate Brown is a dumbass.
Oh, forgot, the D pretty much nails that much down.
It must take a lot of work to be that demonstrably stupid.
As for Oregon voters, you can redeem yourselves by pulling a BLM on that wench’s house. After all, she has allowed them to do it to you, why not return the favor?
So how do you find ouþ if that light cold you had, or what you thought might be an allergy was covid or not?
From: Retain Mike Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 11:37 AM Subject: Mask Mandate
The Center for Disease Control (CDC) came out with its latest policy about masks and our governor has mandated wearing them. But does it make any sense?
The best science the CDC can point to is a group of uncontrolled studies highlighting first such groups as 139 hairdresser clients, 382 sailors on the U.S.S. Roosevelt, 124 Beijing households, and 839 Thailand residents subject to contact tracing. All results come from observation followed by personal judgement, and none result from the mathematical disciplines used to evaluate complex environments. In the same article the CDC disparages the 2020 randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Denmark involving 4,862 participants, which found no benefit to wearing a mask to prevent infection.
The disciplines of a RCT divides participants into different groups on a randomized basis. Random assignment means that factors not specifically controlled can cancel each other out by appearing equally in both groups. One group receives the treatment (which in this case was the mask) and the other group does not.
Researchers can isolate the one variable and are not able to introduce biases to produce a preferred outcome. RCT’s are considered the highest standard for this type of research. Therefore, the most reasonable approach the CDC could take would be to use this study as one to which others would be evaluated. An especially valid approach, since the first four combined from their May scientific brief have less than half the participants of the Danish study.
Do Masks Work? https://www.city-journal.org/do-masks-work-a-review-of-the-evidence?wallit_nosession=1
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33205991/
Science Brief: Community Use of Cloth Masks to Control the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/masking-science-sars-cov2.htm
Absence of Apparent Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from Two Stylists After Exposure at a Hair Salon with a Universal Face Covering Policy — Springfield, Missouri, May 2020 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6928e2.htm
Does anyone have any information on whether there is a class action lawsuit against the vaccine mandates in Oregon?
Are there any class action lawsuits in Oregon regarding any vax mandates?