[Wayne07]

Ivermectin is stupid as a substitute for a vaccine. Data has been mixed, but the evidence that it has any benefit is extremely weak. Show me a study and I'll tell you why you can't extrapolate from it. Most have either been small samples, shown small effects, or outright fraud (Egyptian study).

It is harmless to take it, but harmful to believe it is protecting you or a substitute for the vaccine. Phil Valentine is an anecdote you might consider outside of the studies.

This is pretty calm, rational article that doesn't vilify ivermectin, but highlights that lack of evidence it works at this point.

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/ivermectin-still-lacks-scientific-support-as-a-covid-19-drug-69049

If someone wants to take Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine, no problem. But get vaccinated as well.

[rb22982]

100% of COVID news is controlled by organizations and goverments that benefit (cheap, noncontrolling) things like Ivermectin not working. Every anti-ivermectin study I've seen compares Ivermectin results with 70+ age vs non-ivermectin with younger folks (which have 1/5000th to 1/50th the risk rate depending on age and health). If you won't give me the cross-tabs, I don't care at all what you tell me. The article you linked literally screams propaganda.

The Vaccines don't work. Look at Israel and Iceland data and then adjust for WEIGHT and RACE. Don't do that and the data you are comparing is WORTHLESS.

[rb22982]

Invermectin safe and effective

[WoofDog123]

how do you evaluate risks of ADE down the road from current vax products, particularly in light of this issue with coronavirus vaccines in general and sars-1 in particular?

based on an article on nih site recently it seems ade is not being specifically highlighted in the informed consent disclosure, but I have seen no one claim it is not a possibility. it seems like something people should be made aware of.

[babble-on]

70% of calls to Mississippi poison control this month have been from people who ingested livestock de-wormer.