Replies

If you believe in Dr. Kory, listen to what he says:

Vaccines will offer better, or longer-lasting, protection than any drug.

So get vaccinated, and if you want to play with Ivermectin afterwards, go for it.

Treatments don’t create antibodies. The illness does. And the illness creates long-lasting broad immunity for most ppl. The best immune system is one in which vitamin D blood levels are optimized; those ppl might not even develop antibodies because their base level immunity is so strong.

You can take my cv19vx. I’m never taking it.

from your article:
" Research has demonstrated that using this medicine for prophylaxis can reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection by 92.5%."

They misleadingly calculate the “effective” number by calculating the reduction in infections from the vaccinated versus the placebo which was 0.74 (placebo)-0.04 (vax)=0.7 and then they divide that result by the total placebo cases to get the 95% effective rate: 0.7/0.74=0.95.
https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/3/199/htm

This study came out in Dec 2020 when they where still in the first phase of the injections. Meaning they couldn't have gotten any actual effectiveness when they recently put it in the arm.
This is the study they took it from
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04368728?term=NCT04368728&id=NCT04368728&draw=2&rank=1

this study came out in phase two
Peer-reviewed research from @TheLancet shows that the experimental vaccines reduce your chance of catching COVID-19 by:
Pfizer: 0.8%
Johnson & J: 1.2%
Moderna: 1.2%
AstraZeneca: 1.3%
So, basically NO prevention, no immunity and no antibodies
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext

You neglected to mention those previously infected with Covid who are now immune. They don’t need to get an experimental vaccine, so it’s not pro-vaccine vs anti-vaccine at all. The refusal of the pro-vaccine ppl to even acknowledge natural immunity makes no scientific sense and makes me think they have an agenda.