Replies

"It appears to me that there has been a disinformation operation that has sold people on the idea that the very thing the vaccines are preventing (disease) is the thing the vaccines are causing. The more proof that comes through invalidating this lie, the more people who are sold on it are going to scramble to explain it all away. If you watch the way this is pitched by the liars, its a lot of ego, they call people who disagree sheeple, and heap all sorts of abuse to keep people from thinking logically."

You are absolutely right. There has been a disinformation campaign.

But you may sh to take a gander at a mirror.

Vax-holes have media, government, academia, big tech, big pharma, big business in general, the Democrat party and the RINO half of the Republican party, and Hollywood behind them. Set aside the fact that that cast of characters alone should raise red flags about any issue. Still, total monopolization of information, data and analysis is not enough for that group. That power has been used to ridicule, suppress, censor and punish anyone who has the temerity to question, research, observe or analyze the data and come to a different conclusion. Or simply to ask to see the data and methodologies behind the pronouncements

There's actually a word for that, back from when words had meanings - propaganda.

Is it logical to force a medical treatment that has barely been tested by conventional procedure?

Is it logical to approve it when there are more adverse effects than any previous "vaccine"?

Is it logical to change the definition of vaccine just to allow a completely different treatment to be accepted by the uninformed?

Is it logical to ignore that we had no variants until people started getting vaccinated, and now we have several with ever more forecasted? Or that the medical term for that very mechanism is one of those things that "must not be discussed"

Is it logical to jettison civil rights for half the population because they don't believe a group of people with a history of lying and are willing to risk being part of the .05% who may die, and that's if they even get Covid first?

Is it logical to threaten medical providers for trying alternative therapies, or questioning the efficacy of the imprimatured treatments with data and firsthand observation?

I could go on but, to paraphrase Twain, trying to convince the fooled they've been fooled is way too hard.

More to the point, to paraphrase Goebbels, you don't run a disinformation campaign without controlling the media.

I didn't used to be against these experimental, never-before-successful treatments. I had an open mind, but was just "vaccine-hesitant" (isn't that a cute phrase) and was going to give it some time to see what the side-effects were before I took it. I have allergies so my immune system is already a bit wonky.

But it wasn't long before even that position became too "extreme", and that only led me to research for myself into the treatment, the disease, and the clowns running this show.

So yes, from my perspective, you are a sheep. Whether due to blind faith or willful ignorance doesn't really matter much to me. You've aligned with the wolves believing when they tell you they'll protect you - do you expect to be lauded for your obsequity?

The media and others had to admit that they were wrong about the Chinese lab in Wuhan as a possible source for Covid-19, vindicating Trump. That is evidence of critical thought. The anti-vaxxers never admit they are wrong that I know of. They just move on to the next lie.

And its all too easy really, people with a whole lot of hate and few resources can try to exterminate people they hate just by telling them a pack of lies about vaccines so they won’t take them and end up catching the diseases instead. Covid isn’t our first dance with the anti-vaxxers. School systems out West have been breakthrough cases of developing world diseases for years.