Anyone who says there’s no evidence of fraud is either willfully trolling or criminally stupid.
Ignorance is not the same as stupidity. There is a Kabbalistic principle, that no lie can exist without some basis in truth. There is enough evidence to require further investigation and strong suspicions of fraud, yes. But there has been no discovery and cross-examination of witnesses by both parties, which would be a prerequisite for evidence presented in the context of a trial.
Where the Dems and their fellow travelers give themselves away is in that they refuse to even look into the matter, and dismiss all evidence out of hand, like a drunk who won’t take a breathalizer test and just calls the cop who pulled him over a racist. They should be eager to debunk the “big lie” with a bipartisan examination of the alleged evidence; i.e., discovery, and adversarial depositions of witnesses. They won’t hear of it.
Our friend should familiarize himself with the very real evidence, including punitive action taken against the witnesses who stepped forward at the state legislative hearings. Until he does, he is merely ignorant and gas-lighted. If his opinions remain unaltered after all that, he is likely stupid. But his in-forum record is not that of a troll.