The United Federal Administrative Units of America?

Warnings that state and local governments faced a fiscal calamity were predictably plentiful when it became clear in early 2020 that COVID-19 would cause major social and economic disruptions. Predictable because it has become gospel that the solution to an economic downturn is to have the federal government suck money out of the private sector, redistribute it to state and local governments minus a cut for all three levels of bureaucracy and then spend the remainder -- often wastefully -- according to political desires and special-interest dreams.

There were a few of us who argued that federal bailouts for state and local governments were both unnecessary and unwarranted. As it turns out, state and local tax revenues hardly collapsed. In fact, state and local tax revenues are up after a brief drop early in the pandemic. While state and local revenue levels are lower than pre-pandemic projections, state and local politicians have come away with more of their constituents' money to spend -- hardly a calamitous outcome. According to the National Association of State Budget Officers, "state general fund spending is projected to grow 5.0 percent in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 levels, with 39 states proposing spending increases according to governors' budgets."

But the handful of heretics were ignored, and the Trump and Biden administrations teamed with Congress to allocate almost $1 trillion in combined federal aid to state and local governments on pandemic relief grounds. So, in addition to state and local politicians getting to spend more of their own constituents' money, they also get to spend more money from current and future taxpayers in the other 49 states -- an even sweeter deal from their perspective because it's all political gain and no political pain. Just ask embattled California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is facing a recall election due to dissatisfaction with his handling of the pandemic and is using part of his state's unexpected bounty to send out $600 checks to voters.

What's extra-galling about the federal government's financial coddling of state politicians is that it rewarded governors for destroying their own economies and wreaking havoc on countless lives through haphazard lockdowns and other illogical pandemic policies. That nearly $1 trillion in federal aid to state and local governments doesn't include funds for the millions of people having their businesses and careers upended by these policies.

The governors shuttered the businesses, but in the form of the Paycheck Protection Program, federal taxpayers were put on the hook for another $800 billion to help those businesses survive -- not to mention hundreds of billions more for their unemployed workers. And one can only imagine the long-term taxpayer costs associated with peoples' physical health needs being put on hold, the increase in drug and alcohol abuse, the widespread mental health damage and the millions of children whose educational and social growth was stunted because of governors who cared more about self-serving teachers' unions.

Yet state dependency on federal largesse was a growing problem well before the pandemic. As originally designed, the federal government was to have responsibility for areas that were national in scope (e.g., common defense) with everything else left to the states (e.g., education, policing). But whereas federal aid to the states in 1940 was only $13 billion in today's dollars and "only" $239 billion in 2000, it's projected to be over $1 trillion for 2021 and to continue rising as the Biden administration and congressional Democrats aim to have the federal government finance yet a greater share of overall government spending.

additional paragraph

With the federal government accounting for roughly a third of total state spending prior to the pandemic, it's fair to wonder what the future holds for the relationship between the federal government and the states. The Constitution gave the states sovereign powers and limited (or at least tried to limit) the propensity for federal domineering. Today, the federal government not only dominates the states, it often does so with the encouragement of state and local officials who are all too happy to cash Uncle Sam's "free" checks. The strings attached are a mere inconvenience. As a result, we're continuing to move even further down the road toward the states effectively becoming administrative units of the federal government. That's kind of a big deal, and yet it seems like nobody cares -- perhaps because so few are even aware.

The slide to defederalize the union of the several States began a long time ago, and the balance has slipped back and forth over the decades. The last time that “States’ rights” were even pushed at the expense of the Federal domination resulted in the Civil War of 1861-1865, which was not about freeing the slaves at all, but entirely about which school of philosophy would govern the relationships between the Federal level of government and the individual state level of government. The freeing of the slaves was purely a collateral benefit, and mostly a rallying point to get the wavering Northern states on board for engaging in the “scorched earth” policy of unconditional surrender.

The Reconstruction era was an attempt at nation-building within the boundaries of our nation, and it was almost as unsuccessful as attempts to nation-build in Iran or Afghanistan. As the Federal troops withdrew, the former Confederacy states simply resumed their old way of doing business, not by actual defined slavery, but by putting the now “free” former slaves into an economic bondage they did not escape for more than a century, except by migration elsewhere.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.