“My dispassionate working hypothesis is thus: This Lindell symposium is intended to poison the waters just prior to the release of the Maricopa audit results.”
Get thee hence? Funny. I didn’t put any words in your mouth. YOU said ‘MY hypothesis... - THIS Lindell Symposium - ‘IS INTENDED TO POISON’.
Your words. Mike Lindell put on the symposium. You say the symposium is intended to poison the waters.
So - explain what you mean if what you mean does NOT mean that Mike Lindell is trying to be devious and not as he - on its face - loves this country, wants a righteous and just outcome and truth to be revealed everywhere. I (and most normal logical people) would read what you wrote as meaning he is being disingenuous.
Me get thee hence? No. You explain yourself.
Your statements themselves wreak of the exact thing you claim to be happening.
I did not attack the man, I attacked the thing, the symposium. I don’t know Lindell. I don’t know who convinced him to sponsor this thing at this time.
It’s obvious Lindell has no personal expertise in cyber security, meaning he has to rely on others. Because he’s high profile, the odds that he’s been “worked” by one or more deep cover operatives are virtually 100%.
One Hundred Percent.
It’s “reek”, BTW