“Then you should be able to disprove it.”
Well, the problem is ... there’s no “it” to disprove.
Lots of rhetoric, speculation, and assertions - but no actual _evidence_.
Don’t get me wrong, I was having a WTF moment before 10pm on Election Day, obviously cheating was going into high gear (major metro area announced halt to counting, to resume next morning) and there’s plenty of “well that ain’t right” piling up since. Stolen election? yeah probably.
We’ve heard much of audits and recounts, but no objective details released - at least, no “well there it is” objective facts. No “well there’s 437 registered voters in this precinct and 13,273 of them voted for Joe”. No “these 1372 voters did, in fact, vote early and often”. Lots of “devastating evidence coming soon!” ... and it’s August now.
Remember, good cheating doesn’t leave evidence proving it happened. Yeah, a whole lotta archived ballots got shredded - they’re gone. Manual “naw, he _really_ wanted to vote for Joe” digital record changes happened - without a trail. If there was cheating, it only need be in a few statistically tenuous areas easily bumped back over the line with some plausible deniability.
Yeah, I’d like to disprove it.
Er ... what “it” exactly?
That’s the thing, it’s difficult to either prove or disapprove something happened. But I do believe that all things hidden will be revealed. I’m just waiting for that.
I don’t think it was any one thing. I think it was deliberately a bunch of little things that all add up to massive fraud. Mike is a good man, he’s digging everywhere and he could well stumble onto the very thing that will reveal the thread that can be pulled to unravel the whole scheme. Let him keep looking.