Posted on 08/11/2021 9:08:14 AM PDT by lasereye
The $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill is a sham. Not only that, it's a sham that sets up a much bigger round of explicitly partisan spending later in the year.
In a climactic vote this afternoon, 19 Senate Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R–Ky.), signed onto the bill, which calls for $550 billion in new spending as part of more than $1 trillion in funding for roads, bridges, waterways, and broadband. The bill also includes essential infrastructure provisions like, er, requiring unproven new drunk-driving-prevention technology on cars, a vaping ban on Amtrak, and new reporting requirements for cryptocurrency.
The Republicans repeatedly claimed that the spending would be fully paid for, despite plenty of reasons to suspect that it won't be. As Reason's Eric Boehm reported, the Congressional Budget Office, Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeper, estimates that the bill would add at least $256 billion to the deficit, and probably more like $400 billion. Nineteen Republicans voted for it anyway.
The same Republicans also claim that while they support the infrastructure spending, they are deeply opposed to the rest of the Democratic agenda, which is being moved separately as part of a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation package that Democrats plan to pass on a party line.
You might think of the budget resolution as the "everything else bill." It funds the bulk of President Joe Biden's agenda that is not physical infrastructure. It's focused largely on climate and social spending—vastly increasing federal funding for Medicare, Obamacare, and a yet-to-be-determined new federal health program as well as welfare-style payments to parents of children and the "first ever Civilian Climate Corps."
Democrats have insisted that this bill too will be fully paid for, but they haven't spelled out the precise mechanisms. And reconciliation instructions released earlier this week allow for as much as $1.75 trillion in deficit spending over the next decade; like the infrastructure bill, it's unlikely that this "fully paid for" legislation will actually be fully paid for in the end.
The $3.5 trillion budget plan, in other words, is a big government, progressive-agenda spending bill (even if the progressives would have preferred an even bigger reconciliation package). It's the sort of legislation that Republicans claim to oppose, and have promised to fight vigorously.
The Republicans signing onto the infrastructure bill have argued, in effect, that doing so restrains Democratic ambitions. In this telling, the bipartisan bill serves as a more modest alternative to Democratic spending plans—a compromise that forces Democrats to chisel down their ambitions. It's no such thing.
Instead, the better way to look at the two bills is as a package deal. That's how Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D–Calif.) sees it. She's been clear from the start that she will only take up the Senate's bipartisan bill as a two-part play, along with the $3.5 budget plan. "There ain't no infrastructure bill without the reconciliation bill," she said in June. That's how one key centrist Senate Democrat, Joe Manchin (W. Va.) sees it too: Late last month, he said that "if the bipartisan infrastructure bill falls apart, everything falls apart." Sen. Tim Kaine (D–Va.) said last month that if somehow the bipartisan bill fell apart, Democrats would just…add $600 billion or so to their reconciliation bill, meaning they'd get $4.1 trillion or so either way. And while Biden has since (kinda-sorta-maybe) backtracked, he has also said that the two bills could work in "tandem."
Meanwhile, the Congressional Progressive Caucus released a statement today saying that its members "won't support a bipartisan bill without a bold reconciliation bill to advance our priorities." It's a two-bill deal.
The best way to think of these two pieces of legislation, then, is not to think of them as two entirely separate bills, but as a package deal representing $4.1 trillion in spending on the Biden agenda. And rather than restraining Democratic spending ambitions somehow, the infrastructure bill tees up the rest of the package, advancing the ball on the larger Biden agenda.
So when 19 Senate Republicans turn out to vote for the infrastructure deal, arguing that it's a fully paid for compromise that doesn't raise any taxes, they are effectively supporting a $4.1 trillion tandem package, and everything that may end up in it, even while pretending that they are adamantly opposed.
To understand why this happened anyway, it's important to understand the almost mystical allure of bipartisan dealmaking in Congress, especially in the Senate. In parts of official and high-status Washington, bipartisan deals are seen as a good unto themselves, almost independent of what's in them. And for a certain type of lawmaker, that allure has an even greater appeal now, in the post-Trump era, when one of the Senate's own is in the White House. Biden himself is a true believer in the power of across-the-aisle dealmaking.
At the same time, Congress has been consumed by gridlock and dysfunction, and as a result there has been a growing sense, shared in part by many frustrated lawmakers, that it has lost the ability to get things done.
The bipartisan infrastructure deal is intended as a kind of a rejoinder to that narrative, an answer to the question: Who says Congress can't get big things done? The $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure deal, and its $3.5 trillion partner budget bill, says yes, Congress can get big things done—big, terrible things.
All the contracts for building stuff if there are any will be given to Non-white companies
Demonrats will have to buy larger wallets to hold all those trillions.
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill is far worse than a sham. The bill is a destructive attack on the infrastructure of the United States.
“The Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill Is a Sham”
The whole Biden Administration Is a Sham
There, fixed it
Biden Infrastructure Plan Includes Billions For ‘Gun Violence Prevention’
Was that part still buried in the Plan mitch praised?
“for roads, bridges, waterways, and broadband.”
Been reading it, These items are not for everyone nationally. They are only for a very few select state projects and territories.
As a retired person, on a fixed income, I will be paying a hidden tax to pay for the generosity of this congress.
Printing money devalues the dollar, inflation is not good for retirees. A proposed increase in Social Security benefits is a temporary (band aid) solution that eventually leads to further loss of buying power.
The stupid bastards proudly prance around saying, “we didn’t raise your taxes!” Well, true, but they are hiding the fact that printing money is a hidden tax on retirees.
It’s not a sham, we really are on the hook for it.
Nineteen Republicans joined all the Democrats in voting for the $1.9 Trillion infrastructure deal.
Seven are up for re-election in 2022:
Richard Burr of North Carolina (Voted to convict Trump 2nd Impeachment), claims to be retiring.
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska (Voted to convict Trump 2nd Impeachment), (Voted in support of Pelosi’s January 6th Commission).
Roy Blunt of Missouri
Mike Crapo of Idaho
Chuck Grassley of Iowa
John Hoeven of North Dakota
Rob Portman of Ohio (Voted in support of Pelosi’s January 6th Commission).
Four are up for re-election in 2024:
Mitt Romney of Utah, (Voted to convict President Trump 1st Impeachment Trial, Voted to convict Trump 2nd Impeachment Trial), (Voted in support of Pelosi’s January 6th Commission).
Kevin Cramer of North Dakota
Deb Fischer of Nebraska
Roger Wicker of Mississippi
Eight are up for re-election in 2026:
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky
Bill Cassidy of Louisiana (Voted to convict Trump 2nd Impeachment), (Voted in support of Pelosi’s January 6th Commission).
Susan Collins of Maine (Voted to convict Trump 2nd Impeachment), (Voted in support of Pelosi’s January 6th Commission).
Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina
Jim Risch of Idaho
Dan Sullivan of Alaska
Thom Tillis of North Carolina
The Infrastructure Bill should have included completing the border wall, and restoring the XL pipeline. This would have created thousands of jobs.
Apparently all Senate Democrats and 19 Republican Senators want the Biden policy of open borders to continue. Obviously they think American citizens should not be protected from environmental degradations, violence, illicit drugs and the high costs of free transportation, free housing, free education and free medical care given to illegals.
We are told there is a Covid pandemic but obviously welcoming illegals with Covid shows that all Democrat and 19 Republican Senators are not concerned with Covid transmissions, just control of citizens.
EVERY ONE of the Assistant Democrats that voted for this one KNEW they were setting up the next one that would kill the country.
Traitors all.
John Hoeven of North Dakota
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Voted for Rubio’s amnesty bill in 2013 that ALL of them KNEW would result in a permanent Democrat majority.
The trillions in debt under Biden are just like his boss Obama’s spend and spend more. Go into stores and you will see few cashiers. They have to work while those who stock shelves can screw off.
Article I, Section 8:
“post-offices” “post-roads”
“forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings” in the “district” and “places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state”
If the federal government pays for state road repair, states will let their roads deteriorate until federal funds are received.
If the federal government pays for city street repair, cities will let their streets deteriorate until federal funds are received.
Roads like US27 and I-95 are federal roads. GA49 is a state road.
Federal motor fuel taxes should pay for federal road and bridge repair and construction.
State motor fuel taxes should pay for state road and bridge repair and construction.
Interesting point, so many rinos, rarely do you see Dems move to vote with the Republicans. It’s hard to keep up with them.
This latest bill authorizes the “study” of a federal “fee” on all miles drove.
Hey I’m circling back on this:
“Of the 13 GOP senators who voted for the 2013 immigration (amnesty) bill, just five remain: Rubio, Graham and John Hoeven of North Dakota, Susan Collins of Maine, and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska” - MSN via Google.
Will update my file on this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.