That wasn’t ad hominem. The subject of the post was the man that it was against. And it backed up the attack with evidence. In fact one could argue it was actually response to an ad hominem attack.
“That wasn’t ad hominem. The subject of the post was the man that it was against. And it backed up the attack with evidence. In fact one could argue it was actually response to an ad hominem attack.”
*****
Huh? He said I need a remedial English course. Your argument is a red hearing.