Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CrazyCatChick

>>If you haven’t taken the Moderna or Pfizer choices, will you consider Novavax?<<

Is it a traditional inactivated virus type vaccine that contains no aborted fetal tissue/cells and or mRNA?

Yes, I would consider it.


20 posted on 08/06/2021 4:34:48 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: servantboy777

I haven’t studied it, but I’m interested in it.

From the article:

In this context, the success of the Novavax vaccine should be A1 news. The recent results confirm that it has roughly the same efficacy as the two authorized mRNA vaccines, with the added benefit of being based on an older, more familiar science. The protein-subunit approach used by Novavax was first implemented for the hepatitis B vaccine, which has been used in the U.S. since 1986. The pertussis vaccine, which is required for almost all children in U.S. public schools, is also made this way. Some of those people who have been wary of getting the mRNA vaccines may find Novavax more appealing.


27 posted on 08/06/2021 4:40:34 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: servantboy777

>>>If you haven’t taken the Moderna or Pfizer choices, will you consider Novavax?<<

Is it a traditional inactivated virus type vaccine that contains no aborted fetal tissue/cells and or mRNA?

Yes, I would consider it.<

So is J&J.


103 posted on 08/06/2021 6:12:16 PM PDT by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson