Renowned Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough: Natural Immunity is Effective, Covid Vaccines are Not (Video)

Rair Foundation USA ^ | August 5, 2021 | Renee Nal

[SoConPubbie]

“The vaccine doesn’t stop the illness and it doesn’t reduce mortality.”

Dr. McCullough sees patients every week and serves as the editor of two major journals. His work has appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet and others. He is the co-editor of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, and associate editor of the American Journal of Cardiology and Cardiorenal Medicine.

In an exclusive interview at RAIR Foundation USA, Dr. McCullough explains that he saw a “great void” in the lack of early treatment for the coronavirus. So he did what any thoughtful physician would do – he “put together a team” to address the issue.

Nonexistent Early Treatment

While Dr. McCullough has focused on heart and kidney disease for most his career, the Internist became gravely concerned in early 2020 about what he saw as a complete lack of proper treatment for those who contracted the virus.

“I saw patients getting sick at home – getting no treatment, no care – government agencies completely missing the ball on treating patients early to prevent hospitalization and death,” he told RAIR. “In fact, government agencies [were] not even recognizing that the goal is to prevent hospitalization and death!”

“So I had to step forward, and I did what other people didn’t do,” Dr. McCullough said. “It’s the simplest virus to treat,” the physician said. “In fact, we’ve learned so much about treating this virus, it would probably apply to others!”

‘There has never been a dental clinic outbreak’

Dr. McCullough explained that simply cleaning the nose and mouth could be a preventative. “[T]here has never been a dental clinic outbreak since the beginning,” despite being in people’s mouths all day long, he said. “Dentists use anti-infective dentistry,” he explained. “So if you brush your teeth and swish and spit with yellow Listerine, that works. You can use Povidone-Iodine diluted, hydrogen peroxide diluted as a swish and spit twice a day…” he advised. He also mentions nasal sprays, as well. And there are studies on this, Dr. McCullough said. These preventatives are recommended for other viruses, so why has the government been silent on this solution?

‘Patients should demand antibody infusions’

A special issue in December, 2020 at the “Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine” journal titled “Utilizing Technology in the COVID 19 era,” features an abundance of information. As noted in the abstract of one of the chapters: “Prompt early initiation of sequenced multidrug therapy (SMDT) is a widely and currently available solution to stem the tide of hospitalizations and death.”

The clear government and media suppression of information related to preventative and early treatment of the coronavirus is criminal. How many deaths could have been prevented if proper information was presented to citizens instead of the relentless fear-mongering and droning on about masks?

“In America we would start with an antibody infusion for a high-risk senior,” Dr. McCullough explained. This can be achieved in Emergency Rooms, clinics and nursing homes, and “cuts mortality by 50 percent,” he said.

But Dr. McCullough states that despite the astounding success of this treatment, the public has not been properly informed. “There’s 500 million pre-purchased doses of these antibodies and none of the hospitals are letting the patients know where they are. Governments never mention it on TV, no public service announcements, no media announcements,” he said. “So in fact patients should demand antibody infusions.”

“There are reasonable treatments being blocked to people in need,” Dr. McCullough explained. Dr. McCullough lays out some of these treatments in the video. “Demand it!,” he said. If doctors do not prescribe these treatments, “that’s malpractice,” he said.

‘Vaccines are Failing’

“The vaccines now are all completely failing,” Dr. McCullough said. He notes that the “Delta variant,” is “completely resistant to the vaccine.” “To our knowledge, the vaccines are having no effect – this is very important.”

The physician is critical of the vaccine, pointing out many problems associated with it such as “blood clots, which are a big problem.” There is an “array of problems – stroke, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, heart attack – there are blood clots in the brain…” In fact, “over a hundred thousand Americans have either died or been hospitalized after the vaccine – no explanation,” he said.

“It doesn’t work enough and it certainly is not safe enough to take,” he said.

The Delta variant is now responsible for 83 percent of U.S. cases, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and 100% according to the local Texas health departments. Yet despite the apparent ineffectiveness of the vaccine in preventing the Delta variant, the CDC continues to push the vaccine, ignoring the treatments and preventatives discussed.

“The vaccine doesn’t stop the illness and it doesn’t reduce mortality,” Dr. McCullough said. In fact, he states later in the interview, “[I]t should all be about safety! And to this day, we have not had a single safety report to the public. Nothing. No press briefing. No explanation of what’s going on.”

One of the common statements made in defense of the injection is that even though vaccinated people still get infected (referred to as “breakthrough cases”), their symptoms are not as severe. According to the CDC, “fully vaccinated people are much less likely to be hospitalized or die than people with similar risk factors who are not vaccinated.”

On this point, Dr. McCullough says “Is there some benefit? I don’t know….The only thing I know is that they look to me the same in terms of disease severity and they need early treatment.” Regardless of whether an individual is vaccinated or not, he or she must get early treatment.

An important point made during the discussion is that those who already had the coronavirus have “natural immunity”. This was a part of Dr. McCullough’s powerful testimony in April, as reported at RAIR.

Political Fallout

Dr. Peter McCullough could not be silent when he saw what he referred to as a “great void” in the national conversation about early treatment and prevention of the coronavirus from the beginning. When he saw that the vaccine was not effective, but noted that natural immunity was effective, again, he rose to address the issue.

On the same day Baylor University Medical Center filed the lawsuit against Dr. Peter McCullough, they announced that they were requiring all employees to be vaccinated. Dr. Peter McCullough believes that the lawsuit is designed to shut down his voice.

Dr. McCullough was not expecting his voice to become controversial – after all, he was simply stating the truth. But unfortunately, science based in honesty and good faith has become a casualty during this “incredibly mad episode in human history,” as described by Dr. Roger Hodkinson.

The past year and a half has surely been a wake up call for those who once had faith in the medical infrastructure in America and elsewhere. It has been devastating to see that brilliant, highly regarded physicians such as Dr. Peter McCullough have dealt with political obstacles in attempting to help citizens overcome the coronavirus.

[Bratch]

A Pandemic of The Vaccinated – Does The Vaccine Create a Pathway For A More Dangerous Variant?

August 5, 2021 | Sundance | 540 Comments

One of the more commonsense approaches to reviewing COVID-19 data, amid the outbreak of the ‘Delta variant’,  is to look at the percentage of vaccinated people in a regional population, and then look at the percentage of vaccinated people in the hospital with “covid related” symptoms.  [Obviously, the presumption is – if the COVID illness is severe enough to require hospitalization, then the patient is severely or acutely sick.]

A review of Los Angeles and San Francisco, California, area populations/hospitalizations previously showed the percentage of hospitalized COVID patients with the vaccine is identical to the percentage of people vaccinated in the population served by the hospital.   The same data was reflected in the statistics released by Public Health Scotland (link). The percentage of vaccinated people hospitalized is identical to the percentage of people vaccinated in the population.

♦ What does that mean?

Quite simply, it means the vaccine provides no benefit with a COVID-19 illness severe enough to require hospitalization.  So, if the vaccine provides no benefit then why take it, that’s the bottom line question.  

Before going deeper, first watch this video segment:

The Coronavirus Vaccine Uncensored | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. & Del Bigtree

Since that video and discussion above took place in May 2020, we now have a massive number of people who have been vaccinated.  Additionally, and perhaps more importantly, we also now have the data on those vaccinated people coming into contact with the COVID-19 virus after their vaccination (‘Delta Variant’).  The data is very troubling, because it confirms what was presented in that video.

A review of a sizable data-set from Public Health Scotland shows that 87% of the deaths directly attributed to COVID-19 are amid the vaccinated population [SEE DATA].

Putting both sets of empirical data together, this is what you discover:

(1) The vaccination provides no benefit to stop the COVID-19 virus infection rate.

(2) The vaccine does not stop hospitalization from severe symptomatic illness.

(3) The vaccine does not stop severe acute respiratory failure that results from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

(4) The vaccinated population that are hospitalized and then die from COVID-19 represent 87% of all deaths.

These troubling outcomes also are confirmed by the Red Cross earlier saying:

“Vaccinated people cannot contribute convalescent blood plasma to help other COVID-19 patients in hospitals.  That plasma is made up of antibodies from people who have recovered from the virus, but the vaccine wipes out those antibodies; making the convalescent plasma ineffective in treating other COVID-19 patients.”

So, the second alarming question is:  Does the vaccine actually create a pathway, an “antibody immune enhancement” that makes the infection more deadly?

Unfortunately, the data starting to come out now seems to say, yes.  People appear to have a more severe illness when exposed to the virus after vaccination.  That would explain why there is such a high percentage of deaths amid the vaccinated population after exposure.

NOTE: the mortality rate could be a matter of scale.  The elderly population have a higher vaccination rate, and the elderly population have a higher hospitalization rate; ergo the older population group, a more vulnerable population group, would make up a higher percentage of people who have died from COVID related illnesses.   More study seems to be urgently needed.

Overall, the COVID-19 mortality rate is lower than the flu mortality rate; and both are influenced heavily by pneumonia as the symptomatic cause of death.

♦ Ryan Christian is a researcher who has done a very deep dive into the historic CDC and WHO record of flu cases and now COVID cases.  He has an extensive video presentation with dozens of citations from his data research [Main Article].

Christian’s ongoing research indicates the COVID-19 virus is no more deadly than the flu; and Christian uses a historic reference of flu deaths being over-reported and conflated.  Citing a hidden 2011 report to the World Health Organization about avian H5N1 and a new A(H1N1) human influenza virus:

WHO (2011) – […] The pandemic policy was never informed by evidence, but by fear of worst-case scenarios. […] In both pandemics of fear, the exaggerated claims of a severe public health threat stemmed primarily from disease advocacy by influenza experts. In the highly competitive market of health governance, the struggle for attention, budgets and grants is fierce. (link)

HHS (2017) – US data on influenza deaths are false and misleading. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledges a difference between flu death and flu associated death yet uses the terms interchangeably. Additionally, there are significant statistical incompatibilities between official estimates and national vital statistics data. Compounding these problems is a marketing of fear—a CDC communications strategy in which medical experts “predict dire outcomes” during flu seasons.  (link)

Those cited historic examples set the baseline to see how three different sets of illness are being conflated in 2021 to maintain a COVID-19 pandemic policy based on fear, worst case scenarios and false data.

From the CDC website they tell us that deaths from pneumonia, influenza and COVID (PIC) are all reported as COVID-19 deaths without differentiation:

CDC – “Based on NCHS mortality surveillance data available on July 29, 2021, 7.4% of the deaths that occurred during the week ending July 24, 2021 (week 29), were due to pneumonia, influenza, and/or COVID-19 (PIC). This percentage is above the epidemic threshold of 5.5% for week 29.

Among the 1,381 PIC deaths reported for this week (week 29), 642 had COVID-19 listed as an underlying or contributing cause of death on the death certificate, and one listed influenza, indicating that current PIC mortality is due primarily to COVID-19 and not influenza. The data presented are preliminary and may change as more data are received and processed.” (link)

All Pneumonia, Influenza and COVID deaths (the PIC group) are reported exclusively as COVID deaths; and all of that data is dependent on how the hospitals “code” the death.  If all deaths are coded as covid deaths, then the CDC mortality data is assembled based on false baselines.

The entire presentation by Ryan Christian is worth reviewing.  The discussion is wonky and somewhat in the deep weeds, but everything is massively cited with direct sourcing to back up the hypothesis.  [RokFin Video Presentation Here] and his heavily censored Website is HERE.

♦ Bottom Line: COVID-19 is not more deadly than the flu UNLESS you have taken the vaccine; then it might be more dangerous.  The vaccine is ineffective at stopping severe COVID illness and, data suggests, might actually make things worse…. creating a perpetual need for continued booster modifications to counteract the initial issue.

There’s something sketchy about the vaccine when contrast against this data, the CDC twisted language, and the scale of government/media pushing and requiring it.

I do not say this lightly.

[Gene Eric]

>> His work has appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine...

Uh oh

[House Atreides]

“…“The vaccines now are all completely failing,” Dr. McCullough said. He notes that the “Delta variant,” is “completely resistant to the vaccine.” “To our knowledge, the vaccines are having no effect – this is very important.”…”
******************************************************************
And THIS shows either his IGNORANCE or DELIBERATE OBTUSENESS.

[mass55th]

Moderna today said that it’s experimental drug lasts only six months, and boosters would be required. On the other hand, natural immunity lasts for the rest of your life. No booster needed.

[ilgipper]

Why? I know several vaccinated people who got COVID in the past couple weeks. It’s clearly not highly effective. It my be preventing death but not moderate to severe symptoms consistently.

[SoConPubbie]

Now, he’s just obviously smarter than you, and not compromised either.

[Jane Long]

Was that BEFORE, or AFTER CCP purchase?

🤔

[delta7]

Any comments from the vaxers? Fact is “ the science” is showing these jabs are a failure, not effective with the “ new” and even less “ deadly” Covid flu variant…I will not even touch on the documented side effects, many debilitating. If Americans can not see what is happening with a clear mind and demand answers, I believe they will suffer greatly by losing their health AND freedom. Wake up America.

[Renfrew]

“On the other hand, natural immunity lasts for the rest of your life. No booster needed.”

Any evidence for this? No other respiratory infection gives life time immunity. The common cold coronaviruses are able to regularly reinfect every few years.

[Faith65]

bfl

[Jane Long]

And THIS shows either his IGNORANCE or DELIBERATE OBTUSENESS.

---

By the looks of your nonsensical CAPS LOCK and post.....it appears you are having a meltdown.

Attacking a real and proven doctor is NOT a good look, AH.

[Jane Long]

Any evidence for this? No other respiratory infection gives life time immunity.

---

Check out SARS-1.

It’s been studied. The 17++ (likely lifelong) immunity, that is.

[tatown]

I know vaccinated who are hospitalized.

[tatown]

Better than that I read a report of a Spanish Flu survivor who had immunity 90 years later!

[ocrp1982]

“And THIS shows either his IGNORANCE or DELIBERATE OBTUSENESS.” Really? Dr. Atreides? Please enlighten us all with your background and expertise in this area. We’re waiting with bated breath for your anonymous medical expertise.

[House Atreides]

“… Attacking a real and proven doctor is NOT a good look, AH.”
*************************************************************
Sorry, but his words have shown that he IS a proven doctor… a doctor proven to be ignorant. And THAT is not a good attribute in a doctor.

[old curmudgeon]

“The Devil made me say it”.

[Jane Long]

When they mock Dr McCullough....a renowned cardiologist, TX A&M prof, Baylor Med doc.....you know they’ve lost.

Where’s the HA HA HA guy?

[silverleaf]

Another good video
https://rairfoundation.com/dr-hodkinson-slams-covid-psyops-reputations-will-be-slaughtered-pack-of-lies-from-start-to-finish-video/

Dr McCullough is being sued by Baylor
The video has links to a legal defense fund