Not true. FDA approval includes the medical LIABILITY for wrongful death and life threatening side effects which MUST be presented and not obfuscated for “proprietary” reasons. Presented in full with all data— which in this case may NOT be the altered national data.
The Cornell Law ref. states this as “side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.” as an exception to liability.
Since the NIH and CDC both have admitted they did not have the full virus genetic sequence (that is- the actual full Covid 19 genomic sequence), but gave the S-Protein sequence of the spike proteins to Pharma for them to use in preparing the mRNA of small gene segments for use in the “vaccine” it obviates...”properly prepared”, by redefining it. They cannot simply change the definition of a “vaccine” into: mRNA which codes for proteins made in each injected individual new antigens for antibodies to be internally made. It is NOT a “vaccine” and clearly the “vaccine” does NOT protect against the Delta variant mutation in S Protein, nor will it for any other variant (the new one the “Lambda” and on and on). The door is WIDE open on the liability, which, if the FDA follows the law- not regs., law, will not allow approval. It cannot get by on this level of mass human exposure by bypassing the liability.
Point of fact is that the law is out of date as regards mRNA injections of heretofore unknown genetic foreign protein segments into an individual, which has not been with supportive scientific trials properly peer reviewed as to safety and side effects transparently shared per the current law you posted. The mass “vaccination” cannot be a live clinical trial foisted on the entire public, without their consent and with governmental mandate, and BE a proper clinical trial.
The administrative “science is me” Fauci apparatchik cannot “make it so” and have any... any basis of proof other than his own incompetent FIAT (self construction “cause I say so”).
As an example in the FDA approval process the “vaccine” (which is NOT a vaccine) must have disclosure of the gene sequences (the “clipped segments” from the S-Protein of the virus) fully disclosed. This has, to date NOT been disclosed in writing or anywhere else.
Check Merck’s response (as the worlds largest true vaccine maker) to the covid “manufacture” opportunity.They started same as Pfizer, however they backed out of it, and stopped, and are focusing on truly effective therapeutic treatments that cure a full viral infection not the continually mutating S-protein mode of infection.
I agree with you regarding the rushed nature of the FDA approval. However, there is no chance of imposing liability on the government or the manufacturers here. There is a mountain of existing case law on 300aa liability (including SCOTUS precedent) and given the way that the courts have bought into the existing narrative AND the limited means for trying to prove an exception to liability, there isn’t any reasonable chance of success.
Remember, there is more at play here than 300aa immunity. There is also PREP act immunity.
The sole exception for PREP immunity is “willful misconduct.”
And guess what, only a three Judge Panel of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia can find such exemption.
Good luck.
Simply try it simultaneously as product liability and mass malpractice. That will require evidence that the manufacturers knew it was unsafe, and that the practitioners breached their duty to mitigate harm.