>>> ..... babies will start being born...
Or NOT.
Do we know of any who are pregnant now after the shot?
Or maybe they won’t be. Some experimental drugs turn out to cause sterility problems.
In 2018 Sloan Kettering published an article which made reference to possible switching off of “tumor suppressing proteins”. This may have started people thinking about the mRNA issue in new vaccines. Below is a CLAIM and a VERDICT, plus additional material, and my thoughts on all this. I’m still not sure of a correct answer and put my own questions and concerns in the last paragraph.
CLAIM
“Scientists at Sloan Kettering discover mRNA inactivates tumor-suppressing proteins, meaning it can promote cancer”
VERDICT
“Inaccurate”
SOURCE: S.D. Wells, Natural News, 2 Mar. 2021
DETAILS
Inaccurate: The study by Memorial Sloan Kettering researchers, which was cited in the article, didn’t find that “mRNA inactivates tumor-suppressing proteins”. Instead, the study examined mRNA that carried instructions for making tumor suppressor proteins. They found that {when the mRNA had been changed in certain ways, the resulting tumor suppressor proteins didn’t work properly.}
Misleading: The article’s portrayal of mRNA as “cancer drivers” leaves out a significant amount of context. mRNA is essential for life and a normal component of cells.
The detailed article from which the above was taken is:
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/messenger-rna-is-essential-for-life-and-a-normal-component-of-cells-study-by-researchers-at-memorial-sloan-kettering-is-unrelated-to-rna-vaccines/
After reading the whole article I am still not sure what level of risk exists. I have enclosed what I consider the key conclusion in brackets { }. My question is “what is the risk that mRNA might be changed in such a way that ‘resulting tumor-suppressor proteins’ would not work properly??”
Shortly after reading the original 2018 Sloan Kettering article which is linked in the link above, I was reading Bakker’s “The Dinosaur Heresies” regarding how ancient long disappeared traits can reappear in a new genus even after million of years because of FAILED genetic suppression. He gave as an example how rare humans can be born with a tail. We also have rare humans who are born with hair all over their body. Imagine if we had a nuclear winter and a few genetic anomalies were born with hair all over their bodies and mated. Their offspring would have a greater chance of surviving long periods of cold weather and destroyed civilization. So if some mRNA is changed in some way by a vaccination, might there be an “interesting” increase in the birth of rare ANOMALIES as a result??? Statisticians need to look at that possibility. I have asked my sons to avoid mRNA vaccines for themselves and my grandchildren.