Well, employers follow the lead of elected officials. If Noem would have simply said an employer vaccine mandate wouldn't see the light of day in SD, that renders the rest of your argument moot.
do you really want to work for them?
Under no circumstances would I work for an employer that required a vaccine mandate, and I already have legal counsel and paperwork proactively written should my 2 jobs require the jab.
There are many many reasons not to work for a leftist company besides them making you get a vaccine.
Well, again - they're leftist only because they're following the dictates of the elected officials who are too chicken-s--t to stand up for individual choice and liberty.
I don’t really have a problem with her saying this.
I do. This is the 2nd consecutive issue where Noem has folded like a cheap suit. This woman obviously doesn't have what it takes to make it to the Majors.
It’s as much a message to companies (in a tight labor market) willing to alienate their workforce to the point where they might quit, as it is to employees who do not want to meet their employers requirements for continued employment.
So in a tight Labor market it's better to let workers choose to get the jab in which that will make the tight labor market even tighter?
“… and I already have legal counsel and paperwork proactively written should my 2 jobs require the jab.”
Would like to know more about this.
“Well, employers follow the lead of elected officials.”
Where did you get this idea? If elected officials make it law, yes. But generally I disagree with this statement.
“If Noem would have simply said an employer vaccine mandate wouldn’t see the light of day in SD, that renders the rest of your argument moot.”
She cant say that. She can try to enact legislation. She is stating the obvious.