This will be implemented the same way that CalOSHA tried to push vaccinations six weeks ago. It boiled down to setting up a system, using the existing worker safety laws, that puts the onus on the employer to become the vaccine enforcement arm of the government.
In their system, if you didn’t put in place a mandatory vaccine policy (they worded it differently, but that was the effect), you assumed a fairly large administrative burden to identify the vaxed and the unvaxed, put in place “safety” measures to “protect” the vaxed from the unvaxed (I know) etc. There was no force involved though. Perfectly free to operate without it, as long as you’re willing to accept the costs and the liability (all it takes is one disgruntled employee and you’ve got a CalOSHA headache to deal with).
So, we’re a privately held company. We decided to respect people’s privacy, and just assume the costs and the risks. Larger corporations won’t do that. We’re already seeing this, today, in the medical field, and if there’s a “mandate”, as discussed in the posted article, other industries will grumble, but will comply.
So who will enforce the jab if they mandate the vax for employment? The employers will. No publicly traded company will rebel. Some mom and pop operators will fight, but they will be cleaned up in detail.
Retail? Combination of worker safety laws, business license enforcement, and who knows, fines for the businesses that resist.
Banking? Do you really think that Wells Fargo will violate a federal policy that they require customers to prove their vax status? No way.
There will be no rounding up and putting people in gulags, because no significant numbers of people will resist a mandate with force.
None of this is new, just the context is changed.
Btw, we've already seen a million videos depicting violence over things like masks, a lot of injuries and some were killed. So physical force has already been seen over and over and over.