I was born in Southeast Asia in the fifties.
Cost-benefit analysis says the balance of risk for people over fifty justifies vaccination. All else should not be pressed to take them, as it requires accepting greater risks than it mitigates.
This is not a simple rhetorical issue, it is real and it is complex. Both sides on this do not treat the problem seriously, it is all or nothing, in a very stupid way.
How does Ivermectin prophylaxis with zinc and D3 supplements change that cost-benefit equation? Ivermectin has a risk profile about like aspirin or Tylenol.