Replies

If we were treating this therapeutically, would we even be talking about these “vaccines”, or lockdowns or any of the rest of this? Wouldn’t very low risk of serious illness or death entirely change our perspective?

You sound confident in your conclusions, but so do those who hijacked the last election and now this issue.

I haven't made conclusions except for myself. I think masks were slightly better than nothing for me. Plus I was required to wear one at work, so I had it on at stores. I think the J&J has benefits that outweigh risks for me. Now that I did that gamble I am pretty convinced for me, and I won't wear a mask again ever.

I am less convinced than ever for the population as a whole. I acknowledge the known risks and that there might be unknown risks. I also know the ivermectin would probably have cut deaths four-fold compared to no treatment. But there were other treatments so a four-fold decrease overall is unlikely.

I also know there were many premature deaths last year, according to official counts, that were not at all COVID. I know many COVID deaths were untested (just presumed COVID). I know many deaths were premature and COVD had a role. I don't know how that relates to therapeutics but I know the vast majorty of doctors were not stupid or evil.