Posted on 07/25/2021 6:41:58 AM PDT by Kaslin
The left claims to want to help people, but almost everything that they do hurts people. Unions hurt their members. Welfare advocates make it impossible to get off of welfare. But, it gets even more confusing as climate activists push for solutions that make life harder for people on Welfare and the anti-corporate wing of the left pushes for policies that hurt the entrepreneurs and innovators. Their attacks aren’t intentional, in fact, they have good intentions. However, they can’t see the forest for the trees.
One group in particular is a great example of these issues. The National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) claims to fight for low-income and disadvantaged people. That is a great mission, and one that almost everyone in the country would agree with.
But, as a part of fulfilling this mission they often sue the organizations that are helping out those same populations. From going after mortgage and auto loan practices to student loan debt and small loan practices, the organization’s mission is evident, but the end result is less access to capital, and fewer ways out of poverty than giving these individuals a helping hand.
NCLC has sued auto companies for unfair practices, Banks for unfair practices, and debt collectors for unfair practices. And, they often win their cases. The companies that they have gone after have been too aggressive both in the opinion of NCLC and the courts.
The problem arises when we look at the incentives that these “wins” create. If these “unfair” practices are removed from the business models – then the profit from them goes away. If the profit from collecting on bad debt goes – then the debt collection goes. And when bad debt can’t be resolved then lending disappears.
The problem isn’t that NCLC is necessarily wrong in their conclusion, given the cases that they have won – they aren’t wrong in their interpretation of the laws. Where they are wrong is in fulfilling their mission. If capital isn’t available to low-income communities – going to college becomes a multiple harder, buying a house becomes harder, and paying the rent and utilities can become impossible if anything unexpected happens.
It is understandable that NCLC finds some of the debt collection practices appalling – and some of them they have proved to be illegal. However, if they really want to help out these communities, they should figure out a way to provide these services without the need of the aggressive practices that they despise. They should do the hard work of setting up businesses that can operate they way that they would support operation.
In the meantime cutting off the only means of accessing capital and better life is doing nothing more than hurting the people that their mission claims that they are helping.
As pointed out at the beginning, it isn’t just NCLC though. This type of counterproductive advocacy is the business model of the left. They hold up the moral flag – and then beat the people that they are claiming to help with that same flag. The left’s support of unions have given rise to high labor costs in the US, which has forced manufacturing of many products overseas. These market changes have hurt the union members, the unions, and all of the support industries that go along with the industries that they have hurt like the auto industry. And, while it's hard to climb out of poverty, the way that the left has designed welfare programs – the marginal tax rate on people climbing out of welfare can be higher than the tax rate of millionaire because as they are making more money and paying more taxes they are also losing benefits.
If the left wants to embrace advocacy that would truly help low-income and disadvantaged people they wouldn’t hurt the companies that are helping those people already – they would instead support entrepreneurs and innovative solutions that could do it better.
Using this logic, then churches should stop their outreaches with food, school supplies, coats and so forth. It creates the same dependency.
The National Park Service, Run by the US Department of the Interior, asks us," Please Do Not Feed the Animals" Their stated reason for this policy being that " The Animals will grow Dependant on the Handouts, and Then they will NEVER LEARN to TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES".
A lack of boundaries invites a lack of respect. Churches establish boundaries, government programs expand to meet the demand caused by the subsidy.
Givers have to learn how to set limits because takers don’t have any.
Bump
The writer is unduly charitable. There is strong existential reason to maintain that in the conduct of competent adults, What we do is what we intend to do. Honest men of normal intelligence can foresee the consequences of their actions. . Those given to hiding under the cover of self-delusion, will disavow the harm they do by claiming,: “That’s not what I intended.” Or more concisely, the most common lie in human history: “I didn’t mean it.”
Church boundaries are primarily listen to the message. The same people are lined up for meals, clothes and other goodies day after day, week after week and month after month. Those who are looking for a free ride seem to find it no matter where it’s provided.
"Intentions" -- good, bad or stupid -- are irrelevant. Actions/results is what matters. This goes for anybody ... anyone.
Democrats - The Road to Hell Party
Republicans - The Rode to Hell Party
Liberalism: The sneaking suspicion that every negative thing everywhere is caused by and or examples white privilege, racism, homophobia, transphobia, gynophobia, Islamophobia, xenophobia - and or Climate Change.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.