Posted on 07/24/2021 5:43:08 AM PDT by marktwain
How BRCC acts in the future may inform us.
It’s a mistake to expect truth and fairness from the NYT. It is a filthy leftist rag that hates this country and everything conservative, White, hetero and good.
Has the head of Black Rifle Coffee Co. repudiated what he was reported to have told the Slimes guy: that basically he doesn’t want customers who question the integrity of the sham vote count?
Black rifle coffee on YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=black+rifle+coffee+company+commercial
The BRC coffee people were not smeared by the NYT. They were simply showing their true corporate colors.
Some of Best’s comments are hard to rationalize away.
Check out this from a previous FR thread:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3977859/posts
How Black Rifle Coffee Used Every Trick In The Book to Fool Conservatives.
Even if they were smeared, they were very naive to walk straight into that ambush.
The coffee snobs laugh at me because I like Chock Full o' Nuts. De gustibus non est disputandum
Dana Loesch had the two guys interviewed in the NYT article (presumably the founders) on to explain the questions they asked and how they answered them. As I was driving during lunch, I didn’t catch everything they said, only that NYT framed their responses badly and folks should remember who wrote the article.
I know Buck Sexton is a drinker and advertiser for them. I’ve not heard what he had to say about it, but expect they had them on The Clay and Buck Show as well.
I’ve not tried their coffee. And 99% of my impression of Black Rifle comes from Buck. I’ve not heard them advertised anywhere else. (I’m a troglodyte that way.) Loesch said she doesn’t have them as sponsors as she’s booked with others and talked to them in pursuit of the story. With all that...they had to know the NYT would jack with their answers and thought they could diffuse the kerfuffle.
I know of Evan Hafer’s contributions to Act Blue, earlier contributions to Barack Obama, and if I’m not mistaken, a picture with Hillary Clinton. I’m not a big fan of Matt Best, I personally not a fan of the whole bro-vet schtick. That being said, if this was a publicity stunt, it was well done; they’re definitely getting attention right now.
BRCC is a great company...This is a hit piece!! My dad said the NYT was only good for the crossword and wrapping fish, but today it isn't that good for those two things....
Wonder if BIGBUCKS sponsored this hit piece...
They said what they said, they don’t want people who think Kyle Rittenhouse acted in self defense or people who support the Proud Boys as customers.
That’s fine, let them sell their over priced coffee to the woke.
“Did the NYT writer lie? That’s almost a given. But the BRCC higherups shuld have known.”
Given all we’ve learned about the management of BRCC, I suspect that the NYT didn’t have to lie, this time.
Chock is good stuff too. As is Bokar. As fo rthe coffee snobs, let them pay through the nose for a label. I’d rather pay for good coffee instead.
I buy my whole bean organic coffee local for daily grind, fresh morning espresso to start my day.
I never had a desire to order online. I watched their meteoric rise...and self-inflicted woke fail/fall.
Well-deserved. I judge on principles. Let the market work.
My kid is a coffee snob. Fresh ground only, and from gourmet shops only. Crazy expensive. French pressed and filtered water used, at just the correct temperature.
I use Costco’s Kirkland Columbian and it perks up great in my Hamilton-Beach percolator (Ol’ Panther).
I thought this would be an ad for BRCC, but it was written in Dean’s usual, objective, way. It winds up being a good article to inform idiots on our side that getting in bed with the NYT is not a good idea, when they control what gets printed...regardless of how smart you think you are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.