UK children will not be offered Covid jab unless vulnerable

The Guardian ^ | 07/20/2021 | Rowena Mason

[ScubaDiver]

Sajid Javid accepts JCVI advice that jab should only be offered to clinically at-risk children over age of 12

Children in the UK will get a Covid vaccine only if they are over 12 and extremely vulnerable, or live with someone at risk, as scientists raised concerns about inflammation around the heart linked to the Pfizer jab.

Sajid Javid, the health secretary, said he accepted the advice of scientific advisers that only children over 12 with severe neuro-disabilities, Down’s syndrome, immunosuppression and multiple or severe learning disabilities should be allowed to get the Pfizer vaccine. Children over 12 who live in the same house as people who are immunosuppressed will also be eligible for jabs.

The opinion of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) expands the eligibility for children, after a previous decision that vulnerable 16- and 17-year-olds could get vaccinated.

[ScubaDiver]

According the US media, the British NIH must be managed by a bunch of science-denying Trumptards.

[ransomnote]

“UK children will not be offered Covid jab unless vulnerable” That sounds so predatory because it is.

[ScubaDiver]

Predatory? In what way?

Virtually every child who’s died of COVID has had a preexisting conditions; Type-1 diabetes, congenital heart & pulmonary conditions and epilepsy. The UK is saying absent that kind of preexisting condition, they’re not going to offer vaccines to children. That’s the opposite of predatory.

Counter that with the US which is teetering on the brink of mandating all children be vaccinated before school starts this fall. THAT is predatory.

[ransomnote]

Predatory? In what way?

Virtually every child who’s died of COVID has had a preexisting conditions; Type-1 diabetes, congenital heart & pulmonary conditions and epilepsy. The UK is saying absent that kind of preexisting condition, they’re not going to offer vaccines to children. That’s the opposite of predatory.

Counter that with the US which is teetering on the brink of mandating all children be vaccinated before school starts this fall. THAT is predatory.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The US policy is far worse, agreed.

The literal text sounded predatory - if they’re vulnerable, we’ll jab them. If their family protects them from us, we won’t.

The research I’ve done to date convinces me the ‘vaccines’ are toxic. The idea of injecting a medically sensitive patient with a toxin horrifies me.

Many of the elderly were dying shortly after ‘vaccination’ and the apologists say it’s because they had so many co morbidities and they were old. But if age and co-morbidities made them vulnerable to dying following vaccination, then I think they shouldn’t be vaccinated. OH! But they’re vulnerable to Covid! And my response is, “So kill them with a vaccine?!”

Dr. McCullough and others have developed treatment protocols that cut the risk of hospitalization/death among the most vulnerable by 85%. This to me seems the better path because you have to amass fresh risks every time you get an injection whereas if you can be helped through the illness with medications, you develop immunity.

I believe the actual efficacy of the ‘vaccines’ is lower than the efficacy of medications. So, I don’t like to hear, “Let’s give the vulnerable the vaccines” and when they have damaging or lethal adverse events after ‘vaccination’, “Oh but they were vulnerable...”