[SeekAndFind]

OK, here is the refutation presented by CNN:

Garrett Archer, an election analyst at ABC15, analyzed the files and found that there were 74,241 ballots on the submitted-ballots list without a corresponding entry on the requested-ballots list, But Archer found that more than 99.9% of the ballots in question were recorded in the submitted-ballots list on October 26 or later. That is in line with the October 23 cut-off date or the requested-ballots list.

The explanation: October 24 and 25 were weekend days when county clerks didn’t update the submitted-ballot list, so they added the ballots cast by in-person voters on those weekend days to the submitted-ballot totals starting on October 26.

What they’re saying is this -— the requested-ballots list stops getting updated 11 days before Election Day but the submitted-ballots list continues to get updated until the day before Election Day.

I am not sure I understand this explanation. This is a very convoluted analysis. WHY would they updated the submitted ballots list but STOP updating the requested ballots list?

I still don’t get how that absolves them from any suspicion of anomalies.

Maybe someone smarter than me can explain it.

[Rennes Templar]

Right. Why would the requested-ballots list stop getting updated?

But, this was done by “an an election analyst at ABC15”, so he must know the score.

[The_Media_never_lie]

So, according to this refutation, there is an updated list somewhere, right?

[Svartalfiar]

What they’re saying is this -— the requested-ballots list stops getting updated 11 days before Election Day but the submitted-ballots list continues to get updated until the day before Election Day.

I am not sure I understand this explanation. This is a very convoluted analysis. WHY would they updated the submitted ballots list but STOP updating the requested ballots list?

It makes sense, but it supports those being fake votes, it doesn't explain their existence! Submitted ballots should follow requested ballots - how can a ballot be submitted if it was never requested? You can always have a lower number submitted, but impossible (outside fraud/error) to have a higher number. If the cut-off date for requesting ballots was 23OCT, then it makes sense to stop updating that total, because it should be staying the same. Whereas submitted votes can come in for days after, so that total should continue to increase for longer.

What I don't get is that they're supposedly mail-in votes, but the explanation is that they were in-person early votes that were added as mail-ins, yes? If that's the case, then early-voting for in person should show a total that comes up 74M ballots short of what that number should be, but I haven't heard anything about them missing thousands of ballots!

[KC_Conspirator]

Logic would then point to a requested list somewhere, correct? Isnt the state supposed to record them? This does not make sense. So therefore, produce a requested ballot list.