[semimojo]

But no one ever noticed they were missing (correct?), so how did 74M ballots get added to one place, when they apparently were never subtracted from the other in the first place?

I suspect the county will say there never were any missing ballots.

They always knew those 74k were early in- person ballots and their numbers match.

[Svartalfiar]

I suspect the county will say there never were any missing ballots.

They always knew those 74k were early in- person ballots and their numbers match.

Yes, that's my assumption as well. BUT, shouldn't the audit have their count off? The county might know exactly where they supposedly came from, but they're keeping everything as hidden as possible. On the audit-side though, their count should show even total numbers, if there's no fraud/major errors. What were the audit's count on the in-person early voting? I assume they saw those numbers as good/even, since they're commenting at all on a potential extra 74M ballots. Or did the audit not even look at in-person for some reason?