[DoodleDawg]

An evolutionary biologist claimed Friday that, should the anti-malarial drug Ivermectin be proven effective against the coronavirus, it would moot the usage of and potentially the ability to administer the U.S. coronavirus vaccines currently active under the Food & Drug Administration's Emergency Use Authorization.

So what he's saying is that because we have a medication that will help you recover from COVID then there is no reason to try and prevent you from getting it in the first place?

[SeekAndFind]

RE: So what he’s saying is that because we have a medication that will help you recover from COVID then there is no reason to try and prevent you from getting it in the first place?

Ivermectin is BOTH a prophylactic and a treatment. What he is saying is if the prophylactic properties of Ivermectin were proven to be effective like vaccines, even if not as high, the clamor for vaccines would not be as urgent.

[ransomnote]

So what he’s saying is that because we have a medication that will help you recover from COVID then there is no reason to try and prevent you from getting it in the first place?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The FDA has two key requirements for an Emergency Use Authorization.
1. It has to be an emergency. By killing the elderly and denying treatment to the sick, and using an invalid PCR test to falsely exaggerate death stats, those driving the ‘plandemic’ created the appearance of an emergency.
2. No other treatments can be available.

If they admitted Ivermectin etc. worked, they don’t have the grounds for an EAU.

The FDA should have granted that EUA to FDA approved drugs Ivermectin, HCQ, AZ etc. and there would have been no problem. Even now they deny there are treatments available in order to hold the ‘vaccine’s’ EUA in place. Sick.