The county's numbers are not fudged in the sense that they made them up out of whole cloth. They come from the machine totals. The AZ forensic audit is historic. It has never been done before in the US or probably anywhere else.
There could be minuscule errors from the hand-count and the third tally, which will done by machine, 600 ballots at a time. Presumably the two hand-counts jibe. If the hand-counts and the third machine count are off by a few hundred voters, then I don't see the issue. If the reported official Maricopa numbers are off by tens of thousands of votes from the audit's triple count (hand and machine), then that is proof of massive fraud.
The forensic audit is looking at other issues as well. Were the mail-in ballots filled out by hand or machine, copied, not folded, on different paper, etc.? They are also looking at the numbers in each precinct and how do they square with the 667 different ballots that were used in the state.
I am more concerned about the reaction of Rep leadership when confronted with the irrefutable proof of election fraud.
I am more concerned about the reaction of Rep leadership when confronted with the irrefutable proof of election fraud.
To me they are counting on the age old, let it simmer, and move on to the next crisis counting on the public to forget.
Well as one of the 85 million , NO I won’t, and you will have a price to pay if its at all possible to get you out of office.
In Trump we Trust.....
He may be number 2 to share that line, but he in many ways was and is our salvation.
That's the key that I'm looking for. The stakes are immensely high. I'm confident Pulitzer/Cyber Ninjas know that errors may ruin the whole damn deal, for everyone.
When our 2 counts approximate each other, and show vast disparity with Maricopa's count AND is backed up with documented duplicate and various other fraudulent ballots....
GAME ON !