Posted on 07/09/2021 9:16:29 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Five California police officers are suing the city of Palo Alto for permitting a Black Lives Matter mural to be painted with anti-police images, claiming that it’s discriminatory against law enforcement and constitutes harassment.
The suit filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court on Sunday claimed that the city enabled a “discriminatory and harassing work environment” by allowing the mural two blocks away from the entrance to the police department, the Daily Post in Palo Alto reported.
“Law enforcement officers, including Plaintiffs, were forced to physically pass and confront the Mural and its offensive, discriminatory, and harassing iconography every time they entered the Palo Alto Police Department,” the lawsuit said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Burning Looting Mobs are anti-cop by definition.
They are blaming the police for their self-inflicted failures!
(And it’s not a mural. Murals are on walls.)
The cops should respond thusly: since you hate us us, very well, we will no longer go in your neighborhoods. You are on your own; you can hunt and kill each other all you like and if any little kids get caught in the crossfire, well that is just too bad. However, if you take your nonsense into a non black neighborhood or you are caught in a non black neighborhood and you have no business being there, you will be summarily executed.
End of discussion.
The question is who's squeal the loudest? The richest...or the poorest?
Good!
If you haven't noticed bLM has been successful in getting their agenda adopted into law and policy. They are successful because the burn, loot and murder. Conservatives writing polite letters their congressman doesnt work.
Someone should sue for defacing city property. Or unsafe driving lanes. Or both.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.